切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (02) : 125 -128. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2017.02.013

所属专题: 文献

护理园地

徒手淋巴引流对乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿的治疗效果分析
曾敏华1,(), 柴洁1   
  1. 1. 510000 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院乳腺肿瘤中心四区
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-16 出版日期:2017-04-18
  • 通信作者: 曾敏华

Therapeutic effect of manual lymphatic drainage on postoperative lymphadenopathy following breast cancer

Minhua Zeng1,(), Jie Cai1   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • Received:2017-02-16 Published:2017-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Minhua Zeng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zeng Minhua, Email:
引用本文:

曾敏华, 柴洁. 徒手淋巴引流对乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿的治疗效果分析[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2017, 03(02): 125-128.

Minhua Zeng, Jie Cai. Therapeutic effect of manual lymphatic drainage on postoperative lymphadenopathy following breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2017, 03(02): 125-128.

目的

探讨徒手淋巴引流对乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2016年10月在中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院乳腺肿瘤中心接受乳腺癌改良根治术的80例女性患者的病历资料,年龄28~82岁,平均年龄(53.4±4.6)岁。按随机数字表法将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。对照组患者进行常规护理;观察组患者在此基础上接受徒手淋巴引流和健康教育等护理干预。比较两组患者术后1周、1、3、6及12个月时的淋巴水肿发生率、腋网综合征(AWS)发生率和肩关节外展功能。

结果

两组患者在术后1周时均未发生淋巴水肿,且术后1个月两组患者淋巴水肿发生率间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但观察组患者术后3、6和12个月的淋巴水肿发生率分别为2.5%(1/40)、5.0%(2/40)和7.5%(3/40),低于同时间的对照组[7.5%(3/40)、12.5%(5/40)和20.0%(8/40)],差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。术后3、6、12个月,观察组患者的AWS发生率分别为2.5%、5.0%、7.5%,对照组为12.5%、15.0%、20.0%,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1周、1、3、6、12个月,关节外展度分别达到45°、90°、180°、180°、180°的观察组患者例数为24例、27例、30例、40例及40例,对照组分别为20例、21例、25例及34例,差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。

结论

对乳腺癌改良根治术后患者进行徒手淋巴引流预防淋巴结水肿能够显著降低腋网综合征,利于关节功能的恢复,值得推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of manual lymphaticdrainage on postoperative lymphadenopathy after breast cancer.

Methods

A review was done on data of 80 female patients at age of 28-82 years [(53.4±4.6) years] treated with radical mastectomy for breast cancer from January 2015 to October 2016. According to the random number table method, 80 patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 40 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with routine nursing. The observation group received nursing care such as free lymphatic drainage and health education., AWS incidence and shoulder abduction were measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation.

Results

There was no significant difference in the incidence of lymph edema between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the incidence of lymphadenopathy between the two groups was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). But the incidence of lymph edema at 3, 6 and 12 months was 2.5% (1/40), 5.0% (2/40) and 7.5% (3/40), respectively, which was lower than that of the control group (7.5%, 12.5% and 20.0%). The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The incidence of AWS in the observation group was 2.5%, 5.0% and 7.5%, as compared with 12.5%, 15.0% and 20.0% in the control group at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). At 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, the degree of external surgery up to 45 °, 90 °, 180 °, 180 ° and 180 ° respectively was seen in 24, 27, 30, 40 and 40 patients respectively in the observation group but in 20, 21, 25 and 34 patients respectively in the control group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The prevention of lymph node edema in patients with improved breast cancer after radical operation can significantly reduce the axillary network syndrome, which is beneficial to the recovery of joint function and is worthy of popularization and application.

表1 两组乳腺癌患者术后淋巴水肿发生率比较[例(%)]
表2 两组乳腺癌患者术后AWS发生率比较[例(%)]
1
张丽娟,朱晓丽,辛明珠,等.徒手淋巴引流预防乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿的效果[J].实用医学杂志(临床护理),2015,31(17):2910-2912.
2
张思义,曹占江,童璐,等.腋窝手术后腋网综合征的治疗及心理干预[J].湖北理工学院学报,2014,30(3):57-59.
3
严梅,蒋妮,王雪芹,等.复合护理干预在乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿治疗效果的研究[J].护士进修杂志,2015,15(9):1109-1110.
4
Korpan MI, Crevenna R, Fialka-Moser V. Lymphedema: a therapeutic approach in the treatment and rehabilitation of cancer patients[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2011, 19(5 Suppl 1): S69-S75.
5
Olszewski WL, Jain P, Ambujam G, et al.Topography ofaccumulation of stagnant lymph and tissue fluid in soft tissues of human lymphedematous lower limbs[J]. Lymphat Res Biol, 2009, 7(4): 239-245.
6
魏盘妹,苏逢锡.腋网综合征的研究进展[J].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2012,6(6):36-38.
7
张玉卫,杨瑞东.运动疗法联合音频电疗法治疗乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿的临床研究[J].中国中医急症,2016,25(1):127-129.
8
胡崇英.护理干预对控制乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿发生的效果研究[J].环球中医药,2015,15(s2):133.
9
徐如涛,韩冬梅,刘大海,等.显微镜下淋巴管静脉吻合术治疗乳腺癌术后上肢2期淋巴水肿的近期疗效观察[J].癌症进展,2016,14(8):799-801.
10
代海鹏,蔡斌,贠军,等.真空负压引流瓶引流对乳腺癌术后皮下积液的预防和治疗分析[J].现代生物医学进展,2013,13(27):5344-5347.
[1] 张旭, 徐建平, 苏冬明, 王彩芬, 王大力, 张文智. 男性乳腺肿块的超声造影特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 854-859.
[2] 邵华, 那子悦, 荆慧, 李博, 王秋程, 程文. 术前经皮超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结转移及负荷的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 849-853.
[3] 章美武, 吕淑懿, 范晓翔, 庄鲁辉, 裘玉琴, 张柏松, 张燕. 超声引导下抽液联合高渗葡萄糖冲洗治疗乳腺癌术后皮下积液的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(03): 327-331.
[4] 康一坤, 袁芃. 三阴性乳腺癌分子遗传学及临床特征研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 290-293.
[5] 晏伍兵, 杨明秀. 乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的治疗现状[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 115-118.
[6] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[7] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[8] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[9] 白雪, 李珺, 邢婵, 高济越, 赵海东. 中华医学会乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿临床实践指南解读[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 245-249.
[10] 王嘉, 郭宝良, 王杉, 张殿龙, 王弥迦, 周天阳, 张建国, 金锋. 初诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌诊疗临床实践指南解读[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 250-254.
[11] 张彬月, 贾红燕. 紫杉醇/白蛋白紫杉醇为基础的化疗联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗三阴性乳腺癌的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 52-58.
[12] 吴亚婷, 张胜行, 王水良. RNA m6A甲基化修饰调控异常在乳腺癌转移中作用的研究新进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 45-52.
[13] 刘飞, 王影新, 马骍, 辛灵, 程元甲, 刘倩, 王悦, 张军军. 不同介质腔内心电图定位技术在乳腺癌上臂输液港植入术中应用的随机对照研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 760-764.
[14] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
[15] 蔡泽宇, 兰慧敏, 于婷, 罗慧. 基于Ti3C2负载阿霉素联合光热治疗抑制乳腺癌细胞增殖的研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 140-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要