切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (03) : 163 -165. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2017.03.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

手法复位联合小夹板外固定治疗桡骨远端骨折疗效观察
刘俊1,(), 吴俊义1, 张杰1   
  1. 1. 213002 江苏常州,江苏大学附属武进医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-13 出版日期:2017-06-18
  • 通信作者: 刘俊

Treatment of distal radius fracture with manipulative reduction combined with external fixation with small splint

Jun Liu1,(), Junyi Wu1, Jie Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of orthopedics, Wujin Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Changzhou 213002, China
  • Received:2017-04-13 Published:2017-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Jun Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Jun, Email:
引用本文:

刘俊, 吴俊义, 张杰. 手法复位联合小夹板外固定治疗桡骨远端骨折疗效观察[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2017, 03(03): 163-165.

Jun Liu, Junyi Wu, Jie Zhang. Treatment of distal radius fracture with manipulative reduction combined with external fixation with small splint[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2017, 03(03): 163-165.

目的

探究手法复位联合小夹板外固定方法治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床治疗效果。

方法

回顾性分析常州市武进人民医院骨科2015年10月至2016年10月收治的54例桡骨远端骨折患者的临床资料,其中,男性22例,女性32例;年龄35~75岁,平均年龄(62.3±2)岁。将54例患者分为观察组(28例)和对照组(26例),观察组患者使用手法复位联合小夹板外固定的方法进行治疗,对照组患者进行切开复位内固定。对比分析两组患者的治疗效果(伤处疼痛减轻及腕关节功能恢复等治疗效果)。

结果

观察组与对照组患者的总体疗效优良率差异无统计学意义[92.86%(26/28)vs 88.46%(23/26),P>0.05]。观察组患者的不良反应发生率为7.14%(2/28),低于对照组的23.08%(6/26),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

手法复位联合小夹板外固定方法可在不降低桡骨远端骨折临床疗效的基础上,减少不良反应的发生,安全性较高,值得临床推广。

Objective

To investigate the effect of manipulative reduction combined with external fixation with small splint in the treatment of distal radius fracture.

Methods

An retrospective study was carried out in 54 patients with distal radius fractures [22 males, 32 females, aged 35~75 years old, average age (62.3+ 2) years] treated in the Department of orthopedics of Changzhou Wujin People's Hospital from October 2015 to Ocotober 2016. 54 patients were divided into observation group (28 cases) and control group (26 cases). The observation group of patients were treated with manual reduction combined with small splint external fixation treatment, and the control group was treated with open reduction and internal fixation. The treatment effect and adverse reaction rate of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results

The observation group compared with the control group of patients The overall efficacy rate was not statistically significant between observation group and control group [92.86% (26/28) vs 88.46% (23/26), P>0.05], but the The adverse reaction rate of observation group was 7.14% , which was lower than that of the control group (2/28) [23.08% (6/26)], the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Manual reduction combined with external fixation with small splint can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions and is worth to be popularized in clinical practice.

表1 两组桡骨远端骨折患者临床疗效的比较[例(%)]
表2 两组桡骨远端骨折患者不良反应发生率的比较[例(%)]
1
王传舜,王秋根. 桡骨远端骨折[J]. 老年医学与保健,2007, 13(6):383-386.
2
罗志恩. 手法复位联合夹板外固定治疗桡骨远端骨折30例临床观察[J]. 中国民族民间医药,2015,10:102-103.
3
徐尉宁,甄晓娜. 手法复位小夹板外固定结合中药治疗中老年桡骨远端骨折效果观察[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,19:123-125.
4
廖兵. 3人提按复位结合小夹板固定治疗老年桡骨远端伸直型骨折75例[J]. 中国中医急症,2014, 23(7):1355-1356.
5
王承志. 手法复位夹板外固定治疗桡骨远端骨折52例疗效分析[J]. 内蒙古中医药,2014, 33(5):39-40.
6
高锋,李红卫,沈晓峰,等. 手法整复+双层夹板固定治疗老年人桡骨远端C型骨折的疗效评价[J]. 内蒙古中医药,2014, 33(25):18-19.
7
胡正军. 中医手法整复治疗桡骨远端涉及关节面粉碎骨折疗效分析[J]. 实用中医药杂志,2013, 29(12):1045-1045.
8
陈中文. 中医正骨手法在尺桡骨桡骨远端治疗中的应用[J]. 大家健康:学术版,2014(2):57-57.
9
娄本海. 手法复位小夹板外固定配合中药熏洗治疗AO"C"型桡骨远端骨折疗效观察[J]. 亚太传统医药,2015,03:73-74.
[1] 宋志强, 张颖, 张清彬. 手法复位联合Twin-Block咬合板治疗急性颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位的临床效果评价[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 144-149.
[2] 柴雷子, 宋财, 刘杰, 田浩然, 张伟. 外固定支架结合克氏针治疗老年桡骨远端开放性骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(03): 243-247.
[3] 吕鹏飞, 裴征, 张清华, 刘家帮. 老年桡骨远端关节内骨折保守与掌侧锁定钢板手术治疗的疗效比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 487-492.
[4] 佟训哲, 赵小林. 老年桡骨远端骨折的治疗方法研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 184-186.
[5] 陈义藩, 郑宁. 肥胖对桡骨远端骨折锁定钢板治疗效果的影响[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2019, 05(04): 201-204.
阅读次数
全文


摘要