切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (05) : 272 -276. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2017.05.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

坏死性筋膜炎的救治
李垒1, 刘保池2,(), 俞晓峰3, 司炎辉1, 张伟伟1, 刘新1, 刘启领1, 冯铁男4   
  1. 1. 201508 上海市公共卫生临床中心外科
    2. 201508 上海市公共卫生临床中心外科;215000 苏州高新区人民医院普外科
    3. 215000 苏州高新区人民医院普外科
    4. 200025 上海交通大学公共卫生学院
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-22 出版日期:2017-10-18
  • 通信作者: 刘保池

Treatment of Necrotizing fasciitis

Lei Li1, Baochi Liu2,(), Xiaofeng Yu3, Yanhui Si1, Weiwei Zhang1, Xin Liu1, Qiling Liu1, Tienan Feng4   

  1. 1. Department of Surgery, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai 201508, China
    2. Department of Surgery, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai 201508, China; Department of general surgery, The people’s hospital of SND, Suzhou 215000, China
    3. Department of general surgery, The people’s hospital of SND, Suzhou 215000, China
    4. College of public health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2017-07-22 Published:2017-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Baochi Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Baochi, Email:
引用本文:

李垒, 刘保池, 俞晓峰, 司炎辉, 张伟伟, 刘新, 刘启领, 冯铁男. 坏死性筋膜炎的救治[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2017, 03(05): 272-276.

Lei Li, Baochi Liu, Xiaofeng Yu, Yanhui Si, Weiwei Zhang, Xin Liu, Qiling Liu, Tienan Feng. Treatment of Necrotizing fasciitis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2017, 03(05): 272-276.

目的

研究坏死性筋膜炎的临床特点和治疗方法。

方法

回顾性分析上海市公共卫生临床中心2010年1月至2017年4月期间收治的26例坏死性筋膜炎患者的临床资料,其中男性21例,女性5例;年龄(47.3±11.2)岁。患者分为两组,常规手术清创换药组及手术清创VSD负压吸引组,对比两组之间术前白细胞、血红蛋白等及术后住院时间等。

结果

26例患者中病变部位下肢11例,肛周12例,腹部3例。8例感染性休克中,4例死亡。常规切开引流手术12例,平均住院时间(26±8)d, VSD引流24例,平均住院时间(19±6) d。VSD引流治疗明显缩短住院时间(P<0.05)。

结论

坏死性筋膜炎进展迅速,合并感染性休克病死率很高。彻底清创引流是最重要的治疗手段,用VSD引流治疗在相同效果下可以缩短住院时间。

Objective

To study the clinical features and the treatment methods of Fournier’s Gangrene (FG).

Methods

Twenty-six patients who were admitted to surgical unit of Shanghai Public Clinical Center presenting with FG between January 2010 and April 2017 were reviewed, including 21 men and 5 women. The average age was 47.3±11.2 years old. Patients were divided into conventional surgery debridement dressing group and surgical debridement plus VSD negative pressure suction group. Preoperative leukocytes, hemoglobin and postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups.

Results

11 cases had sites of gangrene at leg. 12 cases had sites around anal. 3 cases were at abdomen. 8 patients occurred septic shock, among which 4 patients died. 12 patients received normal incision while 24 received VSD. Average hospitalization time of normal incision with drainage was 26±8 days while that of vacuum sealing drainage was 19±6 days. VSD reduce average hospitalization time significantly (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is an acute, rapidly progressive and severe surgical disease and had a high mortality rate caused by septic shock. Debridement and drain age is a main treatment for it. Additional VSD can reduce average hospitalization time with same effort.

表1 常规引流与VSD引流比较(例)
图3 疤痕愈合后的左下腹壁坏死性筋膜炎
图8 创面植皮后愈合良好
1
Corman JM, Moody JA, Aranson WL.Fournier's gangrene in a modern surgical setting: improved survival with aggressive management[J]. BJU Int, 1999, 84(1): 85-88.
2
Morpurgo E, Galandiuk S. Fournier's gangrene[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2002, 82(6): 1213-1224.
3
王新江,马文龙,杜志军,等.VSD结合游离植皮治疗儿童下肢大面积皮肤缺损[J].组织工程与重建外科杂志,2013,9(1):35-36.
4
Yanar H, Taviloglu K, Ertekin C, et al.Fournier's gangrene: risk factors and strategies for management[J]. World J Surg, 2006, 30(9): 1750-1754.
5
Jeong HJ, Park SC, Seo IY, et al.Prognostic factors in Fournier gangrene[J]. Int J Urol, 2005, 12(12): 1041-1044.
6
Yilmazlar T, Ozturk E, Alsoy A, et al.Necrotizing soft tissue infections: APACHE II score, dissemination, and survival[J]. World J Surg, 2007, 31(9): 1858-1862.
7
Roghmann F, von Bodman C, Löppenberg B, et al.Is there a need for the Fournier's gangrene severity index? Comparison of scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with Fournier's gangrene[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 110(9): 1359-1365.
8
Verma S, Sayana A, Kata S, et al.Evaluatuion of the utility of the Fournier's gangrene severity index in the Management of Fournier's gangrene in North India: A multicentre retrospective study[J]. J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 2012, 5(4): 273-276.
9
Eke N. Fournier's gangrene: a review of 1726 cases[J]. Br J Surg, 2000, 87(6): 718-728.
10
Morua AG, Lopez JA, Garcia JD, et al.Fournier's gangrene: our experience In 5 Years, bibliographic review and assessment of the Fournier's gangrene severity index[J]. Arch Esp Urol, 2009, 62(7): 532-540.
11
Sorensen MD, Krieger JN, Rivara FP, et al.Fournier's gangrene: management and mortality predictors in a population based study[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(6): 2742-2747.
12
El-Shazly M, Aziz M, Aboutaleb H, et al.Management of equivocal (early) Fournier's gangrene[J]. Ther Adv Urol. 2016, 8(5): 297-301.
13
Czymek R, Frank P, Limmer S, et al.Fournier's gangrene: is the female gender a risk factor?[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2010, 395(2): 173-180.
14
Malik AM, Sheikh S, Pathan R, et al.The spectrum of presentation and management of Fournier's gangrene-An experience of 73 Cases[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2010, 60(8): 617-619.
15
Sallami S, Maalla R, Gammoudi A, et al.Fournier's Gangrene: What are the prognostic factors? Our experience with 40 patients[J]. Tunis Med, 2012, 90(10): 708-714.
16
Yilmazlar T, Ozturk E, Ozguc H. Fournier's Gangrene: An analysis of 80 patients and a novel scoring system[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2010, 14(3): 217-223.
17
Martinschek A, Evers B, Lampl L, et al.Prognostic aspects, survival rate, and predisposing risk factors in patients with Fournier's gangrene and necrotizing soft tissue infections: evaluation of clinical outcome of 55 patients[J]. Urol Int, 2012, 89(2): 173-179.
18
Ersoz F, Sari S, Arikan S, et al.Factors affecting mortality in Fournier's gangrene: experience with fifty-two patients[J]. Singapore Med J, 2012, 53(8): 537-540.
19
Chen SY, Fu JP, Wang CH, et al.Fournier gangrene: a review of 41 patients and strategies for reconstruction[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2010, 64(6): 765-769.
20
Camp S, Cartwright P, Siddiqi F. The prefabricated gracilis muscle flap with full-thickness skin graft and delay for urethral channel reconstruction[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2011, 67(1): 59-61.
[1] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[2] 杨瑾, 刘雪克, 张媛媛, 金钧, 韦瑶. 肠道微生物来源石胆酸对脓毒症相关肝损伤的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 265-274.
[3] 张霞, 张瑞, 郑志波, 张勤. 紫草素调控乳酸化修饰和线粒体功能改善脓毒症心肌病小鼠的预后[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 275-284.
[4] 张婧琦, 江洋, 孙佳璐, 唐兴喆, 赵宇飞, 崔颖, 李信响, 戴景月, 傅琳, 彭新桂. 基于肾周CT特征结合血清肌酐水平探讨脓毒症伴急性肾损伤的早期识别[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 285-292.
[5] 李振翮, 魏长青, 甄国栋, 李振富. 脓毒症并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者血清S1P、Wnt5a变化及其临床意义[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 293-300.
[6] 彭玲, 吴红, 宛仕勇, 陈斓, 叶子青, 周静. 胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料应用于深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 511-516.
[7] 陈宏泽, 刘晟, 陈旭林. 水动力清创系统在大面积深Ⅱ度烧伤创面清创中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 314-318.
[8] 邓杨, 彭豪, 刘剑文. 腹腔镜疝修补术腹膜前负压引流的效果和长期安全性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 402-405.
[9] 严肃, 束昊, 吉同岳, 孙鲁宁. 肱二头肌长头腱切断与保留对中老年患者的中、小型退变性肩袖撕裂修补术后疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 309-318.
[10] 成人脓毒症患者β-内酰胺类抗生素延长输注专家共识编写组. 成人脓毒症患者β-内酰胺类抗生素延长输注专家共识[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 313-324.
[11] 陈曦, 吴宗盛, 郑明珠, 邱海波. 胸腺萎缩在脓毒症免疫紊乱中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 379-383.
[12] 杨翔, 郭兰骐, 谢剑锋, 邱海波. 转录组学在脓毒症诊疗中的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 384-388.
[13] 陈惠英, 邱敏珊, 邵汉权. 脓毒症诱发肠黏膜屏障功能损伤的风险因素模型构建与应用效果[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 448-452.
[14] 傅新露, 李之岳, 卢丹. 妊娠合并结肠癌穿孔致脓毒症休克一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 227-231.
[15] 席静妮, 李娜, 张琪. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对老年重症社区获得性肺炎进展为脓毒症的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 28-31.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?