切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (02) : 97 -100. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2018.02.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

69例临时中心静脉透析导管患者的临床分析
丁丽萍1, 汪芝霞1,(), 姜维1   
  1. 1. 213100 江苏常州,常州市武进人民医院血液净化中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-11 出版日期:2018-04-18
  • 通信作者: 汪芝霞

Clinical analysis of 69 patients with temporary central venous dialysis catheter

Liping Ding1, Zhixia Wang1,(), Wei Jiang1   

  1. 1. Blood purification Center of Wujin people’s Hospital, Changzhou 213100, China
  • Received:2018-03-11 Published:2018-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Zhixia Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Zhixia, Email:
引用本文:

丁丽萍, 汪芝霞, 姜维. 69例临时中心静脉透析导管患者的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2018, 04(02): 97-100.

Liping Ding, Zhixia Wang, Wei Jiang. Clinical analysis of 69 patients with temporary central venous dialysis catheter[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(02): 97-100.

目的

通过分析69例临时中心静脉置管血液透析患者的相关临床资料,探讨其临床运用的优缺点。

方法

选择常州市武进人民医院血液净化中心2017年1月至12月新留置临时中心静脉导管进行血液透析的69例患者为研究对象,进行回顾性病例分析研究,其中男性42例,女性27例;年龄20~89岁,平均(61.06±15.09)岁。统计并记录69例患者的原发疾病、导管留置部位与时间、导管相关性感染以及导管血栓形成情况、疾病转归。对比分析不同的置管部位对血液透析治疗效果和安全性的影响。

结果

69例临时中心静脉置管患者的原发疾病主要为慢性肾炎30例(43.48%)、肿瘤相关性肾病12例(17.39%)、糖尿病肾病9例(13.04%)等,直接直观原因包括急性肾衰竭17例(24.63%)、慢性肾衰竭首次透析内瘘未成熟43例(62.32%)以及内瘘失功9例(13.04%)。14例(20.29%)患者死亡、7例(10.14%)患者好转、33例(47.83%)转为长期血液透析、5例(7.25%)转为腹膜透析、1例(1.45%)患者放弃治疗。4例(5.79%)患者出现了导管相关性感染,感染率为1.47次/1 000导管日;12例(17.39%)患者发生血栓形成,其中3例(25.00%)溶栓无效,重新置管,余9例(75.00%)患者经溶栓治疗可维持适当的血流量,9例溶栓患者的平均溶栓次数为(3.44±1.84)次。69例临时中心静脉置管血液透析患者中,选择颈内静脉和股静脉的患者分别为39例(56.52%)和30例(43.48%),不同部位导管的留置时间无差异[(39.64±25.43)比(38.86±26.77)d,P>0.05],但颈内静脉置管的导管相关性感染率(0.65次/1 000导管日比2.57次/1 000导管日)和血栓形成率[5.13%(2/39)比33.33%(10/30),P<0.05]均低于股静脉置管。

结论

临时中心静脉置管为透析患者第一时间建立了安全、快捷、可靠的临时血管通路,在临床运用中值得推广;但临时中心静脉透析导管也增加了透析患者的感染率及血栓形成率。

Objective

The clinical data of 69 patients with temporary central venous catheterization hemodialysis were analyzed and the advantage and disadvantage of clinical application were discussed.

Methods

From January to December 2017, 69 patients were selected from the blood purification center of Wujin people’s Hospital of Changzhou City for hemodialysis. Among them, 42 cases were males and 27 cases were females. The average age was (61.06 ±15.09) years. The primary diseases, the location and time of catheter indwelling, the incidence of ductal thrombus and the incidence of ductal thrombus were recorded in 69 patients. The effects of different catheterization sites on the efficacy and safety of hemodialysis were comparatively analyzed.

Results

The primary diseases of 69 patients with temporary central venous catheterization were chronic glomerulonephritis (n=30), tumor associated nephropathy (n=12) and diabetic nephropathy (n=9). The direct cause included 17 cases of acute renal failure, 43 cases of immature internal fistula for the first time dialysis of chronic renal failure, 9 cases of failure of internal fistula. The prognosis of disease included 14cases 7 cases of improvement and 33 cases of chronic hemodialysis, 5 cases of chronic hemodialysis. One patient with peritoneal dialysis (1.45%) gave up treatment. 4 cases (5.79%) developed catheter-related infection. The infection rate was 1.47/1 000. Thrombosis occurred in 12 patients (17.39%), 3 of them (25.00%) had no effect of thrombolysis, and catheterization was re-inserted. The remaining 9 patients (75.00%) were treated with thrombolysis to maintain adequate blood flow. The average number of thrombolysis was (3.44±1.84) times. Among 69 hemodialysis patients with temporary central venous catheters, 39 patients (56.52%) chose internal jugular vein and 30 patients (43.48%) chose femoral vein, respectively. There was no difference in catheter placement time between different sites [(39.64±25.43) d ratio (38.86±26.77) d, P>0.05], but catheter-related infection rates of internal jugular vein catheters (0.65 times/1 000 catheter days vs 2.57/1 000 catheter days) and thrombosis rate [5.13% (2/39)vs 33.33%(10/30), P<0.05]was lower than that of femoral vein.

Conclusion

Temporary central venous catheterization is a safe, fast and reliable temporary vascular access for dialysis patients, which is worth popularizing in clinical application, but it also increases the infection rate and thrombosis rate of dialysis patients.

图1 69例临时导管患者原发病构成
表1 69例临时中心静脉置管血液透析患者的直接置管原因分析
表2 不同部位临时中心静脉导管留置时间的比较[d,(±s)]
表3 4例发生导管相关性感染的临时中心静脉置管血液透析患者详情
表4 不同置管部位的临时中心静脉置管发生导管相关性感染的统计
图2 不同部位临时中心静脉血透导管血栓形成的统计
1
Santoro A, Canova C, Freyrie A, et al.Vascular access for hemodialysis[J]. J Nephrol, 2006, 19: 259.
2
任辉.血液透析患者中心静脉导管感染因素分析[J].中国消毒学杂志,2014,31(1):86-87.
3
菅强,贾保民,殷书升,等.心血管内科控制医院感染的现状及对策[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2010,20(2):241-242.
4
温向琼,余兆兰,孙雪红,等.深静脉双腔导管在血液透析患者中的应用[J].重庆医学,2009,38(22):2849-2850.
5
Vanholder R, Canaud B, Fluck R. et al.Catheter-related blood stream infections(CRBCI): a European view[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2010, 25(6): 1753-1756.
6
Santoro A, Canova C, Freyrie A, et al.Vascular access for hemodialysis[J]. J Nephrl, 2006, 19(3): 259-264.
7
Pisoni RL.Vascular access use and outcomes: results from the DOPPS[J]. Contrib Nephrol, 2002, (137): 13-19.
8
Wasse H, Kutner N, Zhang R, et al.Association of initial hemodialysis vascular access with patient-reported health status and quality of life[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2007, 2(4): 708-714.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[9] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[10] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[11] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[12] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[13] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[14] 杜军霞, 赵小淋, 王浩然, 高志远, 王曼茜, 万楠熙, 张冬, 丁潇楠, 任琴琴, 段颖洁, 汤力, 朱晗玉. 2 型糖尿病的血液透析患者肠道微生物组学高通量测序分析[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 313-320.
[15] 张少青, 吕玉风, 董海霞. 中性粒细胞百分比/白蛋白比值对维持性血液透析患者全因死亡的预测作用[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 321-326.
阅读次数
全文


摘要