切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (05) : 281 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2018.05.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

一种促进神经损伤修复的药物组合物治疗60例MND患者6个月后的疗效观察
岳茂兴1,(), 周培根2, 郝冬琳2, 李瑛2, 尹进南2, 郑琦涵2, 杨学峰2, 梅冰3, 孙志辉3, 马临庆3, 吴静2, 吴娟2, 郁婷婷2, 钱亿超2, 朱晓瓞2, 冯斌2, 徐君晨2, 关竹颖2, 岳慧2, 魏艳红3, 庄德志4, 常华4, 唐瑞秀4, 黄筱丽4   
  1. 1. 213017 江苏常州,江苏大学附属武进医院;100101 北京,中国人民解放军第三○六医院
    2. 213017 江苏常州,江苏大学附属武进医院
    3. 215219 江苏苏州,苏州高新区人民医院
    4. 213164 江苏常州,常州华森康复医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-20 出版日期:2018-10-18
  • 通信作者: 岳茂兴
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点实验室开放课题(SKLKF201601); 常州市2016年度应用基础研究项目(CJ20160006); 常州市武进区2016年度社会发展项目(WS201608)

Therapeutic effect of a pharmaceutical composition on promoting nerve repair in motor neuron disease: report of 66 cases with follow-up for six months

Maoxing Yue1,(), Peigen Zhou2, Donglin Hao2, Ying Li2, Jinnan Yin2, Qihan Zheng2, Xuefeng Yang2, Bing Mei3, Zhihui Sun3, Linqing Ma3, Jing Wu2, Juan Wu2, Tingting Yu2, Yichao Qian2, Xiaodie Zhu2, Bin Feng2, Junchen Xu2, Zhuying Guan2, Hui Yue2, Yanhong Wei3, Dezhi Zhuang4, Hua Chang4, Ruixiu Tang4, Xiaoli Huang4   

  1. 1. Affiliated Wujin Hospital of Jiangsu University, Changzhou 213017, China; 306 Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100101, China
    2. Affiliated Wujin Hospital of Jiangsu University, Changzhou 213017, China
    3. The People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou 215219, China
    4. Changzhou Huasen Rehabilitation Hospital, Changzhou 213164, China
  • Received:2018-09-20 Published:2018-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Maoxing Yue
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yue Maoxing, Email:
引用本文:

岳茂兴, 周培根, 郝冬琳, 李瑛, 尹进南, 郑琦涵, 杨学峰, 梅冰, 孙志辉, 马临庆, 吴静, 吴娟, 郁婷婷, 钱亿超, 朱晓瓞, 冯斌, 徐君晨, 关竹颖, 岳慧, 魏艳红, 庄德志, 常华, 唐瑞秀, 黄筱丽. 一种促进神经损伤修复的药物组合物治疗60例MND患者6个月后的疗效观察[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2018, 04(05): 281-289.

Maoxing Yue, Peigen Zhou, Donglin Hao, Ying Li, Jinnan Yin, Qihan Zheng, Xuefeng Yang, Bing Mei, Zhihui Sun, Linqing Ma, Jing Wu, Juan Wu, Tingting Yu, Yichao Qian, Xiaodie Zhu, Bin Feng, Junchen Xu, Zhuying Guan, Hui Yue, Yanhong Wei, Dezhi Zhuang, Hua Chang, Ruixiu Tang, Xiaoli Huang. Therapeutic effect of a pharmaceutical composition on promoting nerve repair in motor neuron disease: report of 66 cases with follow-up for six months[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(05): 281-289.

目的

观察一种促进神经损伤修复的药物组合物治疗运动神经元病(MND)患者的疗效。

方法

选取2016年9月至2018年4月江苏大学附属武进医院、苏州高新区人民医院及常州华森康复医院收治的60例MND患者为研究对象进行前瞻性自身对照研究,其中男性39例,女性21例;年龄26~73岁,平均年龄(52.87 ± 9.78)岁。在常规综合治疗基础上,将一种促进神经损伤修复的药物组合物[精氨酸1.5~5 g,异亮氨酸1.5~5 g,亮氨酸2.5~7.5 g,赖氨酸1.5~5 g,蛋氨酸0.25~1.5 g,苯丙氨酸0.25~1.5 g,苏氨酸1.5~5 g,色氨酸0.25~1.5 g,缬氨酸2.5~7.5 g,组氨酸1.5~4 g,甘氨酸1.5~4 g,丙氨酸1.5~5 g,脯氨酸1.5~4 g,天冬酰胺0.05~1.5 g,半胱氨酸0.05~1.5 g,谷氨酸1.5~5 g,丝氨酸0.25~2.5 g,酪氨酸0.05~1.5 g,L~鸟氨酸0.25~4 g,天冬氨酸0.5~2.5 g;维生素(维生素B1 1~2 mg,维生素B2 1~2 mg,维生素B6 3~10 g,维生素C 1~3 g)]配制在1个三升输液袋内进行静脉输注,1次/d,28 d为1个疗程,休息2周后行第2个疗程,持续治疗时间≥4个疗程(或6个月)。观察患者治疗前后及随访的肌萎缩侧索硬化症改良功能评分量表(ALSFRS-R)评分、疾病进展率及临床表现等变化情况以评估治疗效果。同时记录治疗过程中患者出现的不良反应,以评价新疗法的安全性。

结果

本组60例MND患者中死亡3例(5.00%),均为疾病晚期呼吸衰竭。肌肉萎缩好转、肌力增加6例(10.00%),舌肌萎缩、构音障碍好转1例(1.67%),流涎好转2例(3.33%),吞咽功能改善1例(1.67%),四肢活动度增加4例(6.67%),1例(1.67%)不能独立行走的患者可辅助蹲起和独自缓慢行走。各阶段ALSFRS-R评分:首次门诊(n=60)的ALSFRS-R评分为15.0~48.0分,平均(32.21±8.70)分;治疗4个疗程(或6个月)时(n=60)的评分为3.0~45.0分,平均(28.32±9.56)分;末次治疗时(n=59)评分为3.0~48.0分,平均(28.36±9.50)分。治疗4个疗程(或6个月)时(n=60,t=-3.950,P<0.05)和末次治疗时(n=59,t=3.845,P<0.05)的ALSFRS-R评分均低于治疗前,差异均有统计学意义。但完成6个月治疗时有19例患者(31.67%)的ALSFRS-R评分上升,2例(3.33%)评分不变,且有61.67%(37/60)的患者疾病进展率较前下降;延长治疗时间后,评分下降患者的占比降低至57.63%(34/59)。对28例停药患者进行2~12月的随访发现:在完成一定疗程的规范化治疗后,即使患者停止用药,仍然可见到较为长时间的持续疗效:25.93%(7/28)停药患者的ALSFRS-R评分较治疗前有所上升;末次随访疾病进展率仍然低于治疗前[0.50(0.42)分/月比0.56(0.60)分/月,Z=-2.691,P<0.05)],且74.07%(20/27)停药患者的疾病进展率较治疗前减缓。但因为停止治疗后,疗效难以在长时间内持续维持在较好水平[74.07%(20/27)患者的末次随访ALSFRS-R低于末次治疗],因此持续的巩固治疗是有必要的。

结论

该促进神经损伤修复的药物组合物能在整体上为MND患者提供机体新陈代谢的底物、辅酶与强劲的动能,从而延缓疾病发展,改善病情与临床症状。新疗法的确无毒无害无副作用,重复性好。

Objective

To observe the efficacy of a pharmaceutical composition for promoting nerve repair in patients with motor neuron disease (MND).

Methods

A prospective, self-controlled study of 60 patients with MND admitted to Wujin Hospital affiliated to Jiangsu University, the People’s Hospital of SND and Changzhou Huasen Rehabilitation Hospital from September 2016 to April 2018 was conducted, including 39 males and 21 females, aged from 26 to 73 years, with the average age(52.87 ± 9.78)years. On the basis of conventional comprehensive treatment, the above pharmaceutical composition [main components: arginine 1.5-5 g, isoleucine 1.5-5 g, lysine 2.5-7.5 g, methionine 0.5-1.5 g, phenylalanine 0.5-5 g, tryptophan 0.5-1.5 g, valine 2.5-7.5 g, histidine 1.5-4 g, glycine 1.5-4 g, alanine 1.5-5 g, proline 1.5-4 g, asparagine 0.05-1.5 g, cysteine 0.05-1.5 g, cysteine 1.5-5 g, serine 0.25-2.5 g, tyrosine 0.05-1.5 g, L-ornithine 0.25-4 g, aspartic acid 0.5-2.5 g and vitamins (vitamin B1 1-2 mg, vitamin B2 1-2 mg, vitamin B6 3-10 g, vitamin C 1-3 g)] was prepared in a three-liter infusion bag for intravenous infusion, once a day, 28 days for 1 course of treatment. After a 2-week interval, the next course of treatment was repeated. And the continuous treatment lasted at least for 4 courses (or 6 months). The changes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis modified functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R), disease progression rate and clinical manifestation were observed in all patients pre- and post-treatment to evaluate the therapeutic effect. The adverse reactions during the treatment were also recorded to evaluate the safety of the new therapy.

Results

Three patients (5.00%) died of the advanced respiratory failure. Symptoms of muscle atrophy and muscle strength were improved in 6 cases (10.00%), tongue muscle atrophy and dysarthria were improved in 1 case (1.67%), salivation were improved in 2 cases (3.33%), the swallowing function was improved in 1 case (1.67%), and limb activity were improved 4 cases (6.67%). 1 patient (1.67%) who could not walk independently could squat and stand up with other’s assistance and walked slowly and independently. For the outpatients (n=60), ALSFRS-R scores ranged from 15.0 to 48.0, with an average of (32.21 ± 8.70) points. After 4 courses (or 6 months) (n=60), the score was 3.0~45.0 points, with an average of (28.32 ± 9.56) points. The score after final treatment (n = 59) was 3.0~48.0 points, with an average of (28.36 ± 9.50) points. Compared with the result before treatment, the ALSFRS-R scores were both decreased after the 4 courses (or 6 months) (n=60, t=-3.950, P<0.05) and the last treatment (n=59, t=3.845, P<0.05). However, after the 6-month treatment, 19 patients (31.67%) had an increase in ALSFRS-R score, 2 patients (3.33%) had the same score, and 61.67% (37/60) had a lower disease progression rate. After a prolonged treatment, the proportion of patients with decreased scores went down to 57.63% (34/59). A follow-up of 2 to 12 months in 28 patients showed that after a certain course of treatment was completed, a long-term sustained effect was observed even if the patient stopped taking the drug; the ALSFRS-R score increased in 25.93% (7/28) compared with that before treatment. And the disease progression rate at the last follow-up was still lower than that before treatment [0.50 (0.42) points/month to 0.56 (0.60) points/month, Z=-2.691, P<0.05). ], and the disease progression rate of 74.07% (20/27) discontinued patients was slower than that before treatment. However, because the effect was difficult to maintain a good level for a long time after stopping treatment [74.07% (20/27) patients with the last follow-up ALSFRS-R was lower than that of the last treatment], a continuous consolidation treatment was necessary.

Conclusions

Clinically, the pharmaceutical composition for promoting nerve damage repair can provide the substrate, coenzyme and strong kinetic energy for MND patients, thus delaying the development of the disease and improving the condition and clinical symptoms. The new treatment is indeed non-toxic, harmless, less side effects and reproducible.

表1 MND诊断标准(Awaji标准)[11]
图1 MND患者治疗治疗4个疗程(或6个月)前后的ALSFRS-R评分变化(%,n=60)
图2 MND患者末次治疗前后的ALSFRS-R评分变化(%,n=59)
图3 MND患者治疗各阶段与治疗前比较的疾病进展率变化(例)
图4 MND患者停药后末次随访与治疗前比较的ALSFRS-R评分变化(%,n=27)
图5 MND患者停药后末次随访与末次治疗比较的ALSFRS-R评分变化(%,n=27)
图6 MND患者停止治疗后末次随访疾病进展率的变化(例,n=27)
1
王力平,樊东升,张俊.我拿什么拯救你[J].科技文萃,2005,(9):75-77.
2
刘柳,汪晴川,盖冬玮,等.利鲁唑在神经保护、镇痛及抗抑郁领域的研究进展[J].化学与生物工程,2017,34(2):6-9.
3
Wagner ML,Landis BE.Riluzole:a new agent for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J]. Annals of Pharmacotherapy,1997,31(6):738.
4
Wang Y,Liu Y,Zhai J,et al.scAAV9-VEGF-165 inhibits neuroinflammatory response and invasion of macrophages into the peripheral nervous system of ALS transgenic mice[J].Brain Res Bull,2018,140:233-242.
5
Zhong SJ,Gong YH,Lin YC.Combined intranasal nerve growth factor and ventricle neural stem cell grafts prolong survival and improve disease outcome in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis transgenic mice[J].Neurosci Lett,2017,656:1-8.
6
Rauskolb S,Dombert B,Sendtner M. Insulin-like growth factor 1 in diabetic neuropathy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J].Neurobiology of Disease,2016,97(Pt B):103-113.
7
Harandi VM,Lindquist S,Kolan SS,et al.Analysis of neurotrophic factors in limb and extraocular muscles of mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J].Plos One,2014,9(10):e109833.
8
Nagara Y,Tateishi T,Yamasaki R,et al.Impaired cytoplasmic-nuclear transport of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J].Brain Pathol,2013,23(5):534-546.
9
李娜,詹青.肌萎缩侧索硬化中医药研究进展[J].神经病学与神经康复学杂志,2018,14(1):38-41.
10
白明慧,特木其勒.蒙药对周围神经系统疾病的治疗研究进展[C]. 2015中国-蒙古国博览会国际蒙医药论坛论文集,2015:44-46
11
蒋雨平.运动神经元病[J].中国临床神经科学,2014,22(6):663-665,671.
12
Lee M,McCambridge A.Clinimetrics:Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-revised(ALSFRS-R)[J].J Physiother,2018,64(4):269-270.
13
Chio A,Mora G,Leone M,Mazzini L,Cocito D,Giordana MT,et al.Early symptom progression rate is related to ALS outcome:a prospective population based study[J].Neurology,2002,59:99-103.
14
Gomeni R,Fava M.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression model[J].Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Other Motor Neuron Disorders,2014,15(1-2):119-129.
15
Gordon PH,Cheung YK.Progression rate of ALSFRS-R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS[J].Neurology,2006,66(7):1314-1315.
16
Proudfoot M,Jones A,Talbot K,et al.The ALSFRS as an outcome measure in therapeutic trials and its relationship to symptom onset[J].Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Other Motor Neuron Disorders,2016,17(5-6):414-425.
17
康丽,胡芳芳,靳娇婷,等.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者生存期的影响因素分析[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2018,39(5):639-643.
18
郑勇,臧大维.肌萎缩性侧索硬化患者粒细胞集落刺激因子的水平[J].广东医学,2017,38(18):2806-2809.
19
吴咸中,李恩,陈士奎.中国中西医结合开拓者[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2018:347.
20
Leigh PN,Ray-chaudhuri K.Motor neuron disease[J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,1994,57(8):886-896.
21
冯凯,许贤豪,孟晓梅,等.运动神经元病的诊治进展[J].中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2006,13(1):57-59.
22
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS).Motor Neuron Diseases Fact Sheet[EB/OL]. [2014-04-13].

URL    
23
周丽娜,宋春莉.肌萎缩侧索硬化基因研究进展[J].医学与哲学,2017, 38(9B): 61-64.
24
Renton AE,Chiò A,Traynor BJ. State of play in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genetics[J]. Nat Neurosci,2014,17(1):17-23.
25
Dash RP,Babu RJ,Srinivas NR. Two Decades-Long Journey from Riluzole to Edaravone:Revisiting the Clin Pharmacokinetics of the Only Two Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Therapeutics[J].Clin Pharmacokinet,2018,57(11):1-14.
26
Okada M,Yamashita S,Ueyama H,et al.Long-term effects of edaravone on survival of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J].eNeurologicalSci,2018,11:11.
27
张印生,韩学杰. 孙思邈医学全书[M].中国中医药出版社,2009:1.
28
段枫,蒲传强.运动神经元病的谷氨酸中毒学说[J].国外医学(神经病学神经外科学分册),2001,28(6):393-396.
29
Camu W,Billiard M,Baldymoulinier M. Fasting plasma and CSF amino acid levels in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis:a subtype analysis.[J].Acta Neurol Scand,1993,88(1):51-55.
30
Plaitakis A,Constantakakis E.Altered metabolism of excitatory amino acids,N-acetyl-aspartate and N-acetyl-aspartylglutamate in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J]. Brain Res Bull,1993,30(3-4):381-386.
31
鲁明,康德瑄,樊东升,等.肌萎缩侧索硬化患者脑脊液中谷氨酸水平增高[J].中华内科杂志,2003,42(3):152.
32
黄诒森.生物化学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1994:125.
33
谢海,王世文,曹宏霞,等.大剂量γ-氨基丁酸与二巯基丙磺酸钠联合维生素B6对毒鼠强中毒大鼠的解毒作用[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2010,19(7):703-707.
34
Martin DL,Rimvall K.Regulation of γ-4Aminobutyric Acid Synthesis in the Brain[J].J Neurochem,1993,60(2):395-407.
35
GJB 7141-2011,液体推进剂损伤诊断标准及处理原则[S].北京:中国人民解放军总后勤部,2011:5.
36
中国人民解放军总后勤部卫生部.战伤救治规则[S].北京:中国人民解放军总后勤部卫生部,2006:94-95.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[3] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[4] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[5] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[6] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[7] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[8] 刘卓, 段虎斌. 生物电相关疗法在神经损伤修复中的应用进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 257-260.
[9] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[10] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[11] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[12] 张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[13] 杨镠, 秦岚群, 耿茜, 李栋庆, 戚春建, 蒋华. 可溶性免疫检查点对胃癌患者免疫治疗疗效和预后的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 305-311.
[14] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要