切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (06) : 334 -338. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2017.06.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

乌司他丁对急性有机磷农药中毒并发急性胰腺炎酶学影响的研究
邹宪宝1,(), 孙宝泉1, 于中锴1, 张艳敏1, 赵波1, 曲爱君1   
  1. 1. 252000 山东聊城,山东省聊城市人民医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-12 出版日期:2017-12-18
  • 通信作者: 邹宪宝

The effect of ulinastatin on enzymology of acute pancreatitis induced by acute organophosphorus poisoning

Xianbao Zou1,(), Baoquan Sun1, Zhongkai Yu1, Yanmin Zhang1, Bo Zhao1, Aijun Qu1   

  1. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Liaocheng People’s Hospital of Shandong, Liaocheng 252000, China.
  • Received:2017-10-12 Published:2017-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Xianbao Zou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zou Xianbao, Email:
引用本文:

邹宪宝, 孙宝泉, 于中锴, 张艳敏, 赵波, 曲爱君. 乌司他丁对急性有机磷农药中毒并发急性胰腺炎酶学影响的研究[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2017, 03(06): 334-338.

Xianbao Zou, Baoquan Sun, Zhongkai Yu, Yanmin Zhang, Bo Zhao, Aijun Qu. The effect of ulinastatin on enzymology of acute pancreatitis induced by acute organophosphorus poisoning[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2017, 03(06): 334-338.

目的

探讨乌司他丁(UTI)对急性有机磷农药中毒(AOPP)并发急性胰腺炎(AP)酶学的影响。

方法

回顾性分析聊城市人民医院急诊科2016年1月至2017年1月收治的55例确诊AOPP并发AP患者,其中男性24例,女性31例;年龄19~70岁[(47.3 ±10.7)岁]。将患者按随机数字表方法随机分为UTI干预组(25例)和对照组(30例)。对照组采用常规治疗方案,UTI干预组在常规治疗的基础上加用UTI进行干预(UTI 10万U+5%葡萄糖注射液250 mL,静脉滴注,q 8 h)。比较两组患者腹痛及腹部压痛缓解时间;观察两组患者治疗前和治疗第2、3、5、7天全血胆碱酯酶(AchE)、血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶和尿淀粉酶变化,并比较两组血清及尿淀粉酶恢复正常范围时间、住院时间及总治疗有效率。

结果

UTI干预组患者腹痛缓解时间[(35.46±6.58) h]、腹部压痛缓解时间[(48.26±8.46) h]均短于对照组[(48.25±8.31) h、(68.54±9.93) h](P均<0.05);AchE在第5、7天UTI干预组高于对照组(P<0.05);血淀粉酶、脂肪酶在入院后第3、5、7天UTI干预组均低于对照组(P均<0.05);尿淀粉酶于入院后第5、7天低于对照组(P均<0.05);UTI干预组患者住院时间[(8.13±1.23) d]、血清和尿淀粉酶恢复正常范围时间[(6.68±1.03) d与(7.23.6±1.15) d]均短于对照组(13.25±2.11) d、(9.07±1.45) d与(11.35±2.05) d],差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);UTI干预组治疗总有效率[95.6%(24/25)]高于对照组[80.9%(23 /30)](P<0.05)。

结论

UTI能通过促进AchE恢复,抑制血清及尿淀粉酶和脂肪酶释放,起到加速治疗AOPP并发AP的作用,临床疗效显著。

Objective

To evaluate the effects of ulinastatin on the enzymology of acute pancreatitis induced by acute organophosphorus poisoning.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was made to 55 cases of AOPP patients with AP admitted to the emergency department of Liaocheng People’s Hospital fromJanuary 2016 toJanuary 2017, including 24 males, 31 females, aged from 19 to 70 years old[(47.3+ 10.7) years old]. Patients were randomly divided into UTI intervention group (n=25) and control group (n=30). The control group was treated with conventional therapy. The UTI intervention group was treated with UTI (100, 000 U UTI + 5% glucose injection 250 mL, intravenous infusion, q 8 h). The degree and relief time of abdominal pain in two groups of patients were compared and the changes of blood cholinesterase (AchE), serum amylase, urine amylase and lipase before and after 2, 3, 5, 7 days treatment in two groups were also observed. The time of serum and urine levels of amylase returned to normal, hospitalization time and total treatment efficiency were compared.

Results

The abdominal pain relief time [(35.46±6.58) h], abdominal tenderness alleviate [(48.26±8.46) h] time in the UTI intervention group were shorter than those in the control group [ (48.25±8.31) h, (68.54±9.93) h] (P<0.05). The levels of AchE in the UTI intervention group in 5, 7 day was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of serum amylase and lipase in the UTI intervention group in the 3, 5 and 7 days were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of urine amylase in the UTI intervention group in 5, 7 day was lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). UTI intervention group The hospitalized time [(8.13+ 1.23) d], serum and urine amylase returned to normal range of time [(6.68±1.03) d and(7.23.6±1.15) d] in UTI group are shorter than those in the control group [(13.25±2.11) d、(9.07±1.45) d与(11.35±2.05) d], and the difference is statistically significant (P<0.05). The total effective rate in the UTI intervention group was [95.6% (24/25)] was significantly higher than that in the control group [80.9%, (23/30)] (P<0.05).

Conclusion

UTI can promote AchE recovery, inhibit the release of serum and urine amylase and lipase and play an positive role in the treatment of AOPP patients with AP. The clinical effect is significant.

表1 两组AOPP并发AP患者治疗前后AchE活性比较(±s,U/L)
表2 两组AOPP并发AP患者治疗前后血清淀粉酶、尿淀粉酶及脂肪酶比较(±s)
表3 两组AOPP并发AP患者血清及尿淀粉酶恢复正常时间比较(±s,d)
1
代玉平.有机磷农药中毒并发急性胰腺炎临床治疗分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2011,32(8):1263.
2
马勇,崔涵.胆碱酯酶的活性检测在有机磷中毒诊治中的临床意义[J].医学综述,2017,23(2):372-374.
3
赵耿生,王文武,张真路.血清脂肪酶和淀粉酶联合测定在急性胰腺炎诊断中的意义[J].国际检验医学杂志,2015,5(7):906-907.
4
陆再英,钟南山.内科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:928.
5
中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组,王兴鹏,李兆申,等.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013,上海)[J].中华胰腺病杂志,2013,13(2):73-78.
6
梁军,蔡海林,张琦,等.MEWS联合疼痛评分对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值研究[J].中国伤残医学,2014,22(8)69-70.
7
李松霏,李文波,董倩倩,等.生长抑素及其类似物在急性胰腺炎治疗中的研究进展[J].中华胰腺病杂志,2017,17(2):140-143.
8
张艳敏,邹宪宝,于中锴,等.急性有机磷农药中毒并发急性胰腺炎的高危因素分析[J/CD].中华卫生应急电子杂志,2017,3(2):104-106.
9
景慧,刘晓塘,王新春.乌司他丁对重症有机磷中毒患者胆碱酯酶活性的影响[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2012,46(5):472-474.
10
姜兴权,胡家昌,宋德彪,等.乌司他丁干预重症有机磷农药中毒的临床研究[J].中国急救医学,2006,26(12):888-890.
11
Takano H, Inoue K, Shimada A, et al.Urinary trypsin inhibitor protects against liver injury and coagulation pathway dysregulation induced by lipopolysaccharide/D-galactosam in einmice[J].LabInst,2009,89(7):833-839.
12
邵义明,张良清,邓烈华,等.乌司他丁对全身炎症反应综合征的治疗作用[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(4):228-230.
13
金红利,彭明清,乌司他丁器官保护作用的研究进展[J].医学综述,2016,22(19):3832-3834.
14
石根萍.乌司他丁联合生长抑素对急性重症胰腺炎患者TNF-α和IL-6水平的影响[J].细胞与分子免疫学杂志,2010,26(9):936-937.
15
邹夏惠,刘敦菊,姜慧英.乌司他丁联合生长抑素治疗急性胰腺炎的疗效分析[J].实用临床医学,2011,12(1):22-24.
16
米令飞,谢桂安,黄渊旭,等.乌司他丁治疗重度有机磷中毒的临床价值[J].医学临床研究,2007,24(7):1156-1157.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 白香妮, 孙巨军, 谢鹤, 李宏斌. 急性胰腺炎患者血清微小RNA-142-3p和磷脂酰肌醇3-激酶水平变化及对并发腹腔感染风险预测[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 222-228.
[3] 李嘉兴, 孙乙文, 李文星. NLRP3炎性小体在急性胰腺炎中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 300-304.
[4] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[5] 党军强, 杨雁灵, 汪庆强, 尚琳, 朱磊, 项红军. 主动经皮穿刺引流治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发急性坏死物积聚的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 671-674.
[6] 杨爽, 余宏亮, 谢敏. CT 与超声检查对急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 541-544.
[7] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[8] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[9] 史清泉, 苗彬, 王烁, 陶琳, 沈晨. miR-181a-5p 靶向ATG5 抑制雨蛙素诱导的大鼠胰腺腺泡细胞AR42J自噬的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 524-530.
[10] 宋燕秋, 戚桂艳, 杨双双, 周萍. 重症急性胰腺炎肠道菌群特征及早期肠内营养联合微生态制剂治疗的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 442-447.
[11] 丛黎, 马林, 陈旭, 李文文, 张亮亮, 周华亭. 改良CT严重指数联合炎症指标在重症急性胰腺炎患者胰腺感染预测及预后评估中的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 432-436.
[12] 田娜, 韩飞天. 基于CT平扫影像组学模型与系统免疫炎症指数预测急性胰腺炎复发模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 355-359.
[13] 刘伟, 高续, 谢玉海, 蒋哲, 刘士成. 基于增强CT影像组学模型在预测急性胰腺炎复发中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 348-354.
[14] 贾绘, 倪薇, 包成明, 褚爱萍, 谷存谦, 郭坤, 常新. CT和彩色多普勒超声对急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝的临床诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 239-243.
[15] 吴子龙, 吴冰, 袁开盛, 胡瑞翔, 杨华, 王存川. 肥胖与胰腺疾病研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 213-219.
阅读次数
全文


摘要