切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 104 -109. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2019.02.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同年龄段小儿急性颅脑损伤临床特点分析
王衍刚1,(), 张俊杰1, 杜顺利1, 吴佳斌1   
  1. 1. 454000 河南焦作,焦作市人民医院神经外科一区
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-04 出版日期:2019-04-18
  • 通信作者: 王衍刚

Clinical features of acute craniocerebral injuries in infants and children in different age groups

Yangang Wang1,(), Junjie Zhang1, Shunli Du1, Jiabin Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, People’s Hospital of Jiaozuo, Jiaozuo 454000, China
  • Received:2019-01-04 Published:2019-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Yangang Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Yangang, Email:
引用本文:

王衍刚, 张俊杰, 杜顺利, 吴佳斌. 不同年龄段小儿急性颅脑损伤临床特点分析[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2019, 05(02): 104-109.

Yangang Wang, Junjie Zhang, Shunli Du, Jiabin Wu. Clinical features of acute craniocerebral injuries in infants and children in different age groups[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(02): 104-109.

目的

分析不同年龄段小儿急性颅脑创伤临床特点。

方法

选取自2016年1月至2018年1月焦作市人民医院神经外科收治的130例10岁以下小儿急性颅脑损伤病例资料进行回顾性分析,其中男性72例,女性58例;年龄0~10岁,平均(4.12±0.63)岁。按年龄分为0~5岁组和6~10岁组,其中0~5岁组91例(69.5%),6~10岁组39例(30.5%)。分析两组患儿一般资料及受伤机制、损伤类型、伤情及治疗方法、预后等特点。

结果

共纳入130例,跌倒是0~5岁组主要致伤原因,6~10岁组患儿中交通事故及高处坠落伤等所占比例明显上升,两组在致伤机制方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。6~10岁组开放性颅脑损伤发生率(28.2%,11/39)高于0~5岁组(14.3%,13/91),两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。6~10岁组患儿急性硬膜外血肿发生率(46.2%,18/39)及脑脊液漏发生率(30.8%,12/39)高于0~5岁组(分别为20.9%,19/91及4.4%,4/91)(P<0.05)。按GCS评分分级,两组均以轻型颅脑损伤为主,两组主要治疗手段均为非手术治疗。23例(17.7%)患者采用开颅手术治疗,23例实施了开颅手术之外的有创治疗措施,两组手术方式差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。按受伤3个月时随访的格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS),130例患者中恢复良好117例(90%),中残11例,重残3例,死亡3例。两组总体预后均较好,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

不同年龄段小儿颅脑创伤在受伤机制、治疗方式等方面存在明显差异。依据颅脑创伤的特点,早期采取积极有效的治疗措施,可改善预后,降低病死率及致残率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical features and therapeutic effects of acute craniocerebral trauma in infants and children under 10 years old.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 130 cases of infants and children with cranial injury in infants under 10 years old from January 2016 to January 2018 was conducted. Among them, 72 cases were males and 58 were females, with average age of (4.12±0.63) years. The injury mechanisms, types, treatment methods and prognosis were analyzed. 130 cases were divided into two groups: 0~5 years old group and 6~10 years old group. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed, and the differences in injury mechanism, type and prognosis of children of different age groups were compared.

Results

A total of 130 cases were enrolled in this study, including 72 males and 58 females, 91 cases (69.5%) in the 0-5-year-old group and 39 cases(30.5%)in the 6-10-year-old group. Falling was the main cause of injury in 0-5 years old group. The proportion of traffic accidents and falling injuries in 6-10 years old group increased significantly. There was significant difference in the mechanism of injury between the two groups(P<0.05). The incidence of open craniocerebral injury in 6-10 years old group(28.2%, 11/39)was higher than that in 0-5 years old group(14.3%, 13/91). There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). The incidence of acute epidural hematoma(46.2%, 18/39)and cerebrospinal fluid leakage(30.8%, 12/39)in children aged 6-10 years were significantly higher than those in children aged 0-5 years(20.9%, 19/91 and 4.4%, 4/91, respectively) (P<0.05). According to the grading of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), mild craniocerebral injury was the main type in both groups, and conservative therapy was the main treatment in both groups. Twenty-three patients(17.7%) underwent craniotomy, and 23 patients underwent invasive treatment besides craniotomy. There was a significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). According to Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS) the patients were followed up for 3 months after injury; 117(90%)of 130 patients recovered well, 11 were moderately disabled, 3 were severely disabled and 3 died. The overall prognosis of the two groups was good, and there was no significant difference(P>0.05).

Conclusions

The traumatic brain injury of infants and children has its special characteristics. The incidence of different age groups differs in gender and treatment methods. According to the characteristics of pediatric craniocerebral trauma, active and effective treatment measures can be taken early to improve prognosis and reduce the mortality and morbidity.

表1 5岁以下小儿急性颅脑损伤分级标准
表2 两组颅脑创伤患儿临床一般情况及治疗方式(例,%)
表4 两组患儿颅脑创伤程度与预后(例,%)
表3 两组开颅手术方式对比(例,%)
1
Lumba-Brown A, Yeates KO, Sarmiento K, et al.Centers for disease control and prevention guideline on the diagnosis and management of mild traumatic brain injury among children[J].JAMA,2018,172(11):e182853.
2
蒋先惠.小儿神经外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994:137.
3
潘锋,李娜,卢旺盛.两岁以下婴幼儿重型颅脑损伤的临床特点与治疗[J].中华解剖与临床杂志,2013,18(2):146-148.
4
赵爱国.小儿外伤性大面积脑缺血的治疗体会[J].中华神经外科杂志,2014,30(2):179-181.
5
和崇军,和桥顺,张四红.高原地区儿童重型颅脑损伤的特点及疗效[J].中华神经外科杂志,2017,33(10):1050-1051.
6
Chong SL, Khan UR, Santhanam I, et al.A retrospective review of paediatric head injuries in asia- a pan asian trauma outcomes study (PATOS) collaboration[J].BMJ Open,2017,7(8):e015759.
7
Punchak M, Abdelgadir J, Obiga O, et al.Mechanism of pediatric traumatic brain injury in southwestern uganda:a prospective cohort of 100 patients[J].World Neurosurgery,2018,114:e396-e402.
8
Dayan PS, Holmes JF, Atabaki S, et al.Association of traumatic brain injuries with vomiting in children with blunt head trauma[J].Ann Emerg Med,2014,63(6):657-665.
9
Fabbri A, Servadei F, Marchesini G, et al.Analysis of different decision aids for clinical use in pediatric head injury in an emergency department of a general hospital[J].J Trauma,2011,70(5):E79-E83.
10
宋建立,方川,崔增学,等.婴幼儿急性颅脑损伤临床分析[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2010,31(2):94-97.
11
陈裴斐.婴幼儿重型颅脑损伤临床特点及分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2011,16(3):332-333.
12
刘腾,杨少波,李昊.去骨瓣减压术在儿童重型颅脑损伤中的应用及研究进展[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2016,37(3):234-237.
13
孙敬伟,赵振林,黄富,等.影响重型颅脑损伤患者预后的临床因素分析[J].中华神经医学杂志,2016,15(3):279-283.
14
刘建雄,毛伯镛.影响小儿重型颅脑损伤预后的危险因素分析[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2005,26(1):15-17.
15
De Vloo P, Nijs S, Verelst S, et al.Pre-hospital and intra-hospital temporal intervals in patients requiring emergent trauma craniotomy. A 6-year observational study in a level 1 trauma center[J].World Neurosurg,2018,114(3):e546-e558.2018.
16
刘佰运,张皓.颅脑损伤单元的探索与实践[J].中华神经外科杂志,2017,33(3):230-233.
17
高国一.颅脑创伤救治单元的建设[J].中华创伤杂志,2015,31(5):388-389.
[1] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[2] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[3] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[6] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[7] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[8] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[9] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要