切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 104 -109. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2019.02.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同年龄段小儿急性颅脑损伤临床特点分析
王衍刚1,(), 张俊杰1, 杜顺利1, 吴佳斌1   
  1. 1. 454000 河南焦作,焦作市人民医院神经外科一区
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-04 出版日期:2019-04-18
  • 通信作者: 王衍刚

Clinical features of acute craniocerebral injuries in infants and children in different age groups

Yangang Wang1,(), Junjie Zhang1, Shunli Du1, Jiabin Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, People’s Hospital of Jiaozuo, Jiaozuo 454000, China
  • Received:2019-01-04 Published:2019-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Yangang Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Yangang, Email:
引用本文:

王衍刚, 张俊杰, 杜顺利, 吴佳斌. 不同年龄段小儿急性颅脑损伤临床特点分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2019, 05(02): 104-109.

Yangang Wang, Junjie Zhang, Shunli Du, Jiabin Wu. Clinical features of acute craniocerebral injuries in infants and children in different age groups[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(02): 104-109.

目的

分析不同年龄段小儿急性颅脑创伤临床特点。

方法

选取自2016年1月至2018年1月焦作市人民医院神经外科收治的130例10岁以下小儿急性颅脑损伤病例资料进行回顾性分析,其中男性72例,女性58例;年龄0~10岁,平均(4.12±0.63)岁。按年龄分为0~5岁组和6~10岁组,其中0~5岁组91例(69.5%),6~10岁组39例(30.5%)。分析两组患儿一般资料及受伤机制、损伤类型、伤情及治疗方法、预后等特点。

结果

共纳入130例,跌倒是0~5岁组主要致伤原因,6~10岁组患儿中交通事故及高处坠落伤等所占比例明显上升,两组在致伤机制方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。6~10岁组开放性颅脑损伤发生率(28.2%,11/39)高于0~5岁组(14.3%,13/91),两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。6~10岁组患儿急性硬膜外血肿发生率(46.2%,18/39)及脑脊液漏发生率(30.8%,12/39)高于0~5岁组(分别为20.9%,19/91及4.4%,4/91)(P<0.05)。按GCS评分分级,两组均以轻型颅脑损伤为主,两组主要治疗手段均为非手术治疗。23例(17.7%)患者采用开颅手术治疗,23例实施了开颅手术之外的有创治疗措施,两组手术方式差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。按受伤3个月时随访的格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS),130例患者中恢复良好117例(90%),中残11例,重残3例,死亡3例。两组总体预后均较好,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

不同年龄段小儿颅脑创伤在受伤机制、治疗方式等方面存在明显差异。依据颅脑创伤的特点,早期采取积极有效的治疗措施,可改善预后,降低病死率及致残率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical features and therapeutic effects of acute craniocerebral trauma in infants and children under 10 years old.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 130 cases of infants and children with cranial injury in infants under 10 years old from January 2016 to January 2018 was conducted. Among them, 72 cases were males and 58 were females, with average age of (4.12±0.63) years. The injury mechanisms, types, treatment methods and prognosis were analyzed. 130 cases were divided into two groups: 0~5 years old group and 6~10 years old group. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed, and the differences in injury mechanism, type and prognosis of children of different age groups were compared.

Results

A total of 130 cases were enrolled in this study, including 72 males and 58 females, 91 cases (69.5%) in the 0-5-year-old group and 39 cases(30.5%)in the 6-10-year-old group. Falling was the main cause of injury in 0-5 years old group. The proportion of traffic accidents and falling injuries in 6-10 years old group increased significantly. There was significant difference in the mechanism of injury between the two groups(P<0.05). The incidence of open craniocerebral injury in 6-10 years old group(28.2%, 11/39)was higher than that in 0-5 years old group(14.3%, 13/91). There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). The incidence of acute epidural hematoma(46.2%, 18/39)and cerebrospinal fluid leakage(30.8%, 12/39)in children aged 6-10 years were significantly higher than those in children aged 0-5 years(20.9%, 19/91 and 4.4%, 4/91, respectively) (P<0.05). According to the grading of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), mild craniocerebral injury was the main type in both groups, and conservative therapy was the main treatment in both groups. Twenty-three patients(17.7%) underwent craniotomy, and 23 patients underwent invasive treatment besides craniotomy. There was a significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). According to Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS) the patients were followed up for 3 months after injury; 117(90%)of 130 patients recovered well, 11 were moderately disabled, 3 were severely disabled and 3 died. The overall prognosis of the two groups was good, and there was no significant difference(P>0.05).

Conclusions

The traumatic brain injury of infants and children has its special characteristics. The incidence of different age groups differs in gender and treatment methods. According to the characteristics of pediatric craniocerebral trauma, active and effective treatment measures can be taken early to improve prognosis and reduce the mortality and morbidity.

表1 5岁以下小儿急性颅脑损伤分级标准
表2 两组颅脑创伤患儿临床一般情况及治疗方式(例,%)
表4 两组患儿颅脑创伤程度与预后(例,%)
表3 两组开颅手术方式对比(例,%)
1
Lumba-Brown A, Yeates KO, Sarmiento K, et al.Centers for disease control and prevention guideline on the diagnosis and management of mild traumatic brain injury among children[J].JAMA,2018,172(11):e182853.
2
蒋先惠.小儿神经外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994:137.
3
潘锋,李娜,卢旺盛.两岁以下婴幼儿重型颅脑损伤的临床特点与治疗[J].中华解剖与临床杂志,2013,18(2):146-148.
4
赵爱国.小儿外伤性大面积脑缺血的治疗体会[J].中华神经外科杂志,2014,30(2):179-181.
5
和崇军,和桥顺,张四红.高原地区儿童重型颅脑损伤的特点及疗效[J].中华神经外科杂志,2017,33(10):1050-1051.
6
Chong SL, Khan UR, Santhanam I, et al.A retrospective review of paediatric head injuries in asia- a pan asian trauma outcomes study (PATOS) collaboration[J].BMJ Open,2017,7(8):e015759.
7
Punchak M, Abdelgadir J, Obiga O, et al.Mechanism of pediatric traumatic brain injury in southwestern uganda:a prospective cohort of 100 patients[J].World Neurosurgery,2018,114:e396-e402.
8
Dayan PS, Holmes JF, Atabaki S, et al.Association of traumatic brain injuries with vomiting in children with blunt head trauma[J].Ann Emerg Med,2014,63(6):657-665.
9
Fabbri A, Servadei F, Marchesini G, et al.Analysis of different decision aids for clinical use in pediatric head injury in an emergency department of a general hospital[J].J Trauma,2011,70(5):E79-E83.
10
宋建立,方川,崔增学,等.婴幼儿急性颅脑损伤临床分析[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2010,31(2):94-97.
11
陈裴斐.婴幼儿重型颅脑损伤临床特点及分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2011,16(3):332-333.
12
刘腾,杨少波,李昊.去骨瓣减压术在儿童重型颅脑损伤中的应用及研究进展[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2016,37(3):234-237.
13
孙敬伟,赵振林,黄富,等.影响重型颅脑损伤患者预后的临床因素分析[J].中华神经医学杂志,2016,15(3):279-283.
14
刘建雄,毛伯镛.影响小儿重型颅脑损伤预后的危险因素分析[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2005,26(1):15-17.
15
De Vloo P, Nijs S, Verelst S, et al.Pre-hospital and intra-hospital temporal intervals in patients requiring emergent trauma craniotomy. A 6-year observational study in a level 1 trauma center[J].World Neurosurg,2018,114(3):e546-e558.2018.
16
刘佰运,张皓.颅脑损伤单元的探索与实践[J].中华神经外科杂志,2017,33(3):230-233.
17
高国一.颅脑创伤救治单元的建设[J].中华创伤杂志,2015,31(5):388-389.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[5] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[6] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[7] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[8] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[9] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要