探讨团队式的培训方法对提高病房护士基础生命支持急救技能的影响。

选取2016年1月至12月在病房工作的81名护士作为对照组，给予传统的培训方法。选取2017年4月至2018年3月在病房工作的90名护士作为实验组，给予团队式培训方法。比较两组护士BLS探查和启动EMSS时间、胸外心脏按压质量、人工通气有效性和抢救药物使用的考核分值。同时比较两个时间段内病房护士因患者发生非预期性心搏呼吸骤停呼叫"院内24 h生命救援队"和ROSC的例数占比。

实验组护士在BLS探查时间，EMSS启动时间，胸外心脏按压质量，人工通气和抢救用药方面得分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组护士呼叫"院内24 h生命救援队"的例数占比明显低于对照组(P<0.05)，但两组之间ROSC的例数占比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

团队式的培训方法开展后，不但提高了病房护士基础生命支持急救技能正确性和实效性，而且降低了启动"院内24 h生命救援队"的频次。

To explore the effect of team-based training on basic life support of nurses in ward.

Eighty-one nurses who worked in the ward from January to December 2016 were selected as the control group and given traditional training methods. The 90 nurses who worked in the ward from April 2017 to March 2018 were given a team-style training method as the experimental group. The assessment scores of BLS probe and EMSS initiation time, quality of chest compressions, effectiveness of artificial ventilation and use of rescue drugs in the two groups were compared. At the same time, the proportion of cases in which nurses in the ward called "24-hour life rescue team in the hospital" due to unexpected cardiac and respiratory arrest of patients and ROSC in the two periods were compared.

The scores of the nurses in the experimental group were all higher than those in the control group in terms of BLS exploration time, EMSS start time, quality of chest compressions, artificial ventilation and rescue medication (P<0.05). The proportion of cases in which nurses in the experimental group call "hospital 24-hour life rescue team" was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in the proportion of cases in ROSC between the two groups (P>0.05).

The team training method not only improves the accuracy and effectiveness of basic life support skills of ward nurses, but also reduces the initiation frequency of "hospital 24-hour life rescue team" .