切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华卫生应急电子杂志

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (06) : 344 -347. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2019.06.007

所属专题： 文献；

论著

百草枯中毒患者肺肾损伤顺序对预后的影响
黄翠君1, 周从阳2,†(), 叶兴文3   
  1. 1. 330006　江西南昌，南昌大学医学院研究生院
    2. 330006　江西南昌，南昌大学第一附属医院急诊科
    3. 332000　江西九江，九江学院附属医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-24 出版日期:2019-12-18
  • 通信作者: 周从阳

Effect of lung and kidney injury sequence on prognosis in patients with paraquat poisoning

Cuijun Huang1, Congyang Zhou2,†(), Xingwen Ye3   

  1. 1. Postgraduate School, Nanchang University Medical College, Nanchang 330006, China
    2. Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
    3. The Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332000, China
  • Received:2019-05-24 Published:2019-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Congyang Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Congyang, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

黄翠君, 周从阳, 叶兴文. 百草枯中毒患者肺肾损伤顺序对预后的影响[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2019, 05(06): 344-347.

Cuijun Huang, Congyang Zhou, Xingwen Ye. Effect of lung and kidney injury sequence on prognosis in patients with paraquat poisoning[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(06): 344-347.

目的

探讨百草枯中毒患者肺肾损伤顺序对预后的影响。

方法

采用回顾性病例对照研究分析选择2010年10月至2018年8月南昌大学第一附属医院急诊科收治的175例百草枯中毒患者的临床资料，其中男性60例，女性115例；年龄14～79岁，平均(36.55±16.13)岁。将175例百草枯中毒患者根据肺肾损伤先后顺序分为肾损伤先于肺损伤组(A组，68例)，肺损伤先于肾损伤组(B组，42例)和肺肾同时受损伤组(C组，65例)。记录各组服毒量、服毒至洗胃时间、服毒至入院时间、年龄、性别、服毒至肺损伤时间、服毒至肾损伤时间，比较患者预后好转或死亡情况。

结果

(1)三组间服毒至洗胃时间、服毒至入院时间、性别差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)，服毒量、年龄差异存在统计学意义(P<0.01)；但年龄与预后无相关性(P>0.05)，服毒量与预后存在正相关性(P<0.001)。(2)A组预后好于B组，差异存在统计学意义(χ2＝8.319，P<0.05)；B组预后好于C组，差异存在统计学差异(χ2＝21.04，P<0.05)。

结论

百草枯中毒患者中，肺肾同时受损患者预后最差，肾损伤先于肺损伤预后好于肺损伤先于肾损伤者；服毒量对预后也具有较好的判断价值。

关键词: 预后, 肺损伤, 肾损伤, 百草枯中毒
Objective

To investigate the effect of lung and kidney injury sequence on prognosis in patients with paraquat poisoning.

Methods

A total of 175 cases of paraquat poisoning admitted to the emergency department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from October 2010 to August 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, including 60 males and 115 females, aged 14-79 years, with an average age of (36.55±16.13)years. The 175 cases of paraquat poisoning were divided into 3 groups according to the sequence of lung and kidney injury. Renal injury was prior to lung injury group(Group A, 68 cases), lung injury was prior to kidney injury group (Group B, 42 cases), and lung and kidney damage group (group C, 65 cases). The data between each group were recorded, including dose of poisoning, the time from poisoning to gastric lavage, the time from poisoning to admission, age, gender, the time from poisoning to lung damage, and the time from poisoning to kidney damage, to compare the prognosis of patients with improvement or death.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of the time from taking poison to gastric lavage, the time from taking poison to admission, and gender (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the dose and age (P<0.01). However, there was no correlation of age on prognosis (P>0.05), while there was a correlation of dose on prognosis (P<0.001). The prognosis of group A was better than that of group B, and the difference is statistically significant (χ2=8.32, P<0.01); the prognosis of group B was better than that of group C, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=21.04, P< 0.001).

Conclusion

The order of lung and kidney injury sequence has an impact on the prognosis: patients with simultaneous lung and kidney damage have the worst prognosis; the prognosis of the patient with kidney damage prior to lung damage is better than that of the patient with lung damage prior to kidney damage. The dose of poisoning also has good value for the prognosis.

Key words: Prognosis, lung injury, kidney injury, paraquat poisoning
表1 三组百草枯患者一般临床资料比较
组别 例数 性别(男/女) 年龄(岁，±s) 服毒量(mL，±s) 洗胃时间(min，±s) 入院时间(h，±s) 服毒至肺损伤时间(d，±s) 服毒至肾损伤时间(d，±s)
A组 68 21/47 30.79±13.11 36.88±48.72 92.09±104.50 16.82±23.02 4.43±2.08 2.01±1.19
B组 42 16/26 41.67±17.76 35.05±33.91 69.29±66.46 12.86±16.78 2.19±1.81 3.26±1.88
C组 65 23/42 39.28±16.30 67.31±56.98 82.31±130.02 14.94±233.75 1.69±0.82 1.69±0.82
表2 三组百草枯患者一般临床资料对比
组别 例数 性别(男/女) 年龄[岁，M(P25，P75)] 服毒量[mL，M(P25，P75)] 服毒至洗胃时间[min，M(P25，P75)] 服毒至入院时间[h，M(P25，P75)]
A组 68 21/47 26.0(20.0，40.7) 20.0(10.0，40.0) 60.0(30.0，90.0) 7.0(4.0，14.5)
B组 42 16/26 38.5(28.0，53.2) 20.0(10.0，50.0) 60.0(30.0，60.0) 6.5(4.7，12.0)
C组 65 23/42 38.0(25.0，51.5) 50.0(20.0，100.0) 60.0(30.0，60.0) 6.0(4.0，9.5)
H/χ2值 ? 0.39 12.65 16.80 0.46 1.05
P值 ? >0.05 <0.01 <0.01 >0.05 >0.05
表3 服毒量、年龄与预后相关性
变量 P值 OR值 95%可信区间
服毒量 <0.001 1.04 1.02～1.06
年龄 >0.05 / /
1
中国医师协会急诊医师分会．急性百草枯中毒诊治专家共识[J]．中国急救医学，2013，33(6): 484-489.
2
Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Duarte JA, Sánchez-Navarro A, et al.Paraquat poisonings: mechanisms of lung toxicity, clinical features, and treatment[J]. Crit Rev Toxicol, 2008, 38(1): 13-71.
3
Mccarthy S, Somayajulu M, Sikorska M, et a1.Paraquat induces oxidative stress and neuronal cell death；neuroprotection by water-soluble coenzyme Q10[J]. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2004, 201(1): 21-31.
4
Meng XX, Wang RL, Gao S, et al.Effect of ulinastatin on paraquat-induced-oxidative stress in human type II alveolar epi-thelial cells[J]. World J Emerg Med, 2013, 4(2): 133-137.
5
Li SP, Han JY, Sun P, et al.Effect of SP-A/B in lipoic acid on acute paraquat poison- ing[J]. World J Emerg Med, 2014, 5(1): 57-62.
6
Weng CH, Hu CC, Lin JL, et al.Predictors of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with paraquat intoxication[J]. PLoS ONE, 2013；8(12): e82695.
7
冷俊岭，邹晓东，李扬，等．大剂量敌草快中毒患者1例报告[J/CD]．中华卫生应急电子杂志，2017, 3(5): 67-68.
8
Jones AL, Elton R, Flanagan R. Multiple logistic regression analysis of plasma paraquat concentrations as predictor of outcome in 375 cases of paraquat poisoning[J]. QJM, 1999, 92(10): 573-578.
9
Feng MX, Li YN, Ruan WS, et al.Predictive value of the maximum serum creatinine value and growth rate in acute paraquat poisoning patients[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 11587.
10
张志坚，周从阳，彭礼波，等．内质网应激与氧化应激在百草枯致大鼠肺纤维化中的作用及沙苑子总黄酮的影响[J]．中华急诊医学杂志，2014，23(9): 998-1001.
11
周从阳，张志坚，罗雅娟，等．乌司他丁对百草枯染毒大鼠肺组织热休克蛋白70和NF-κB的影响[J]．中华劳动卫生职业病杂志，2011，29(4): 280-283.
12
Dinis—Oliveira RJ, de Pinho PG, Santos L, et al.Postmortem analyses unveil the poor efficacy of decontamination, anti—inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapies in paraquat human intoxications[J]. PloS One, 2009, 4(9): e7149.
13
Kim SJ, Gil HW, Yang JO, et al.The clinical features of acute kidney injury in patients with acute paraquat intoxication[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2009, 24(4): 1226-1232.
14
Patschan D, Patschan S, Muller GA.Inflammation and microvasculopathy in renal ischemia reperfusion injury[J]. J Transplant, 2012, 2012: 764154.
15
赵波，菅向东，张忠臣，等．百草枯染毒大鼠组织中毒物含量与脏器损伤的关系[J]．中华劳动卫生职业病杂志，2010，28(3): 220-223.
16
DinisOliveira RJ, Duarte JA, SánchezNavarro A, et al.Paraquat poisonings: mechanisms of lung toxicity, clinical features, and treatment[J]. Crit Rev Toxicol, 2008, 38(1): 1371.
[1] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[2] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[3] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[4] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[7] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[8] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[9] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[10] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[11] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[12] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 易成, 韦伟, 赵宇亮. 急性肾脏病的概念沿革[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 906-910.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号