切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (06) : 348 -350. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2019.06.008

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

神经元特异性烯醇化酶对颅脑损伤患者神经功能预后的评估价值
何玉峰1,()   
  1. 1. 213017 江苏常州,江苏大学附属武进医院ICU、徐州医科大学附属武进临床学院
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-22 出版日期:2019-12-18
  • 通信作者: 何玉峰

Values of neuron-specific enolase in patients with craniocerebral injury in prognostic assessment of neurological function

Yufeng He1,()   

  1. 1. ICU of Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University and The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou 213017, China
  • Received:2019-10-22 Published:2019-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Yufeng He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Yufeng, Email:
引用本文:

何玉峰. 神经元特异性烯醇化酶对颅脑损伤患者神经功能预后的评估价值[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2019, 05(06): 348-350.

Yufeng He. Values of neuron-specific enolase in patients with craniocerebral injury in prognostic assessment of neurological function[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(06): 348-350.

目的

探讨不同原因导致的颅脑损伤患者的神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)在血清中表达水平变化与患者病情严重程度及预后关系。

方法

回顾性分析2016年4月至2016年12月江苏大学附属武进医院重症医学科收治38例患者,其中男性28例,女性10例;年龄25~87岁,平均(53.9±13.3)岁。入院时根据GCS评分分为3组:轻中型组(GCS 9~15分)10例,重型组(GCS 6~8分)14例,特重型组(GCS 3~5分)14例。对各组患者分别进行APACHEⅡ评分并检测血清NSE水平。

结果

所有患者血清NSE水平升高,特重型组高于中重型组和轻型组(P<0.05),且NSE水平越高,APACHEⅡ评分越高,患者病死率越高。

结论

神经元特异性烯醇化酶表达变化可以作为辅助评价颅脑损伤程度的实验室指标,且与患者预后呈负相关。

Objective

To investigate the relationship between the expression of neuron specific enolase (NSE) in serum and the severity and prognosis of patients with brain injury caused by different causes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 38 patients admitted to our intensive care unit from June 2018 to June 2019 was performed, including 28 males and 10 females, aged 25-87 years with an average age of (53.9 ± 13.3) years.The patients who met the admission criteria were GCS scores. The patients were divided into three groups according to the GCS score: mild and intermediate group (group A), severe group (group B) and very severe group (group C). There were 10 cases in group A (GCS 9-15 points), 14 cases in group B (GCS 6-8 points), and 14 cases in group C (GCS 3 to 5 points). The above grouped patients were scored APACHE II respectively. Serum NSE levels were detected.

Results

The serum NSE levels of all patients with craniocerebral injury were higher than those of the moderately severe group and the mild group (P<0.05). The higher the NSE level, the higher the APACHE II score and the higher the mortality rate.

Conclusion

The expression of neuron-specific enolase can be used as a laboratory index to evaluate the degree of craniocerebral injury and is negatively correlated with the prognosis of patients.

表1 三组颅脑损伤患者的血清NSE水平比较(ng/mL,±s)
图1 患者NSE水平与病死率的关系
1
盘毓旻,文治成,贺传沙,等.血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶检测在急性脑梗死患者脑损伤程度评估中的应用[J].现代诊断与治疗,2016, 27(19): 3728-3729.
2
马铁柱,孙艳,周茹,醒脑静治疗重型颅脑损伤疗效观察[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2015,29(12): 1237-1238,1241.
3
王衍刚,张俊杰,杜顺利,等.不同年龄段小儿急性颅脑损伤临床特点分析[J/CD].中华卫生应急电子杂志,2019,5(2): 45-50.
4
Saver JL, Carroll JD, Smalling R, et al.Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association /american stroke association[J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(4): 85-86.
5
Vondrakova D, Kruger A, Janotka M, et al.Association of neuronspecific enolasevalues with outcomes in cardiac arrest survivors is dependent on the time of sample collection[J]. Crit Care, 2017, 21(1): 172.
6
Bharosay A, Bharosay VV, Varma M, et al. Correlation of brain biomarker neuron specific enolase (nse) with degree of disability and neurological worsening in cerebrovascular stroke[J]. Indian J Clin Biochem, 2012, 27(2): 186-190.
[1] 钱晓英, 吴新, 徐婷婷. 颅脑损伤并发呼吸衰竭患者早期机械通气的效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 526-528.
[2] 刘玲, 肖颖, 王蓉. 严重创伤并发肺部感染死亡病例分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 581-583.
[3] 李飞翔, 段虎斌, 李晋虎, 吴昊, 王永红, 范益民. 急性颅脑损伤继发下肢静脉血栓的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 277-282.
[4] 潘立, 谢理政, 程宏伟, 茆翔. 创伤性颅脑损伤后垂体功能减退[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 308-312.
[5] 王景景, 符锋, 李建伟, 任党利, 陈翀, 刘慧, 孙洪涛, 涂悦. 针刺对中型创伤性颅脑损伤后BDNF/TrkB信号通路的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 199-205.
[6] 盛成俊, 沈宇晟, 李彦东, 贺诗茹, 吴徐超, 赵小玉, 曾加, 麦麦提力·米吉提, 更·党木仁加甫, 朱国华. Koos3、4级前庭神经鞘瘤在桥小脑角区的生长方向对面神经功能的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 216-221.
[7] 张馨月, 韩帅, 张舒石, 李文臣, 张舒岩. 颅内压监测技术在创伤性颅脑损伤治疗中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 246-252.
[8] 王守森, 黄银兴, 陈宇晖, 胡晓芳, 刘海兵. 重型颅脑损伤的外科救治策略[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 190-192.
[9] 王召, 田进杰, 郭朝, 王蕾, 严红燕, 冯素娟, 张毅. 血浆PGK1早期检测对创伤性颅脑损伤患者病情严重程度及预后的预测价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 154-159.
[10] 何佳伟, 张良, 杨骐, 王占祥. 创伤性颅脑损伤后进展性出血性损伤的诊疗现状[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 175-179.
[11] 贾素英, 李倩, 郭姗姗. 创伤性颅脑损伤后血小板功能障碍的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 180-185.
[12] 张永明. 颈段脊髓电刺激治疗颅脑损伤后慢性意识障碍的进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 129-134.
[13] 马丽. CT灌注联合血管成像预测急性脑梗死患者近期神经功能预后的价值分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 229-234.
[14] 丁晶, 李培雯, 许迎春. 醒脑开窍针刺法在神经急重症中的应用[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 161-164.
[15] 朱敏, 李法强. 血清GFAP、UCH-L1联合VILIP-1水平对急性脑梗死神经功能预后不良的预测研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 452-457.
阅读次数
全文


摘要