比较非手术治疗与手术治疗多根多处肋骨骨折患者的效果。

选择2018年3月至2020年5月遂溪县人民医院胸心外科收治的98例多根多处肋骨骨折患者作为本次研究对象进行回顾性研究研究，其中男性62例，女性36例；年龄21 ～ 72岁，平均(45.3±9.7)岁。按照随机数字表法将研究对象划分为内固定组和非手术组，每组各有49例。内固定组患者接受内固定术治疗，非手术组接受非手术治疗。比较两组患者住院时间、疼痛缓解时间、骨折愈合时间及并发症发生率差异。

内固定组的住院时间(14.7±4.1)d、疼痛缓解时间(9.4±2.2)d、骨折愈合时间(56.2±5.8)d及并发症发生率22.4%(11/49)比4.1%(2/49)均明显低于非手术组，分别为(24.2±6.2)d、(13.5±5.2)d、(85.2±8.3)d，差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。

对多根多处肋骨骨折患者，实施内固定治疗不仅能有效促进患者的康复，加快缓解患者的疼痛感，还可以减少并发症发生率。

To compare the effects of conservative treatment and internal fixation in patients with multiple rib fractures.

We selected 98 cases of multiple ribs and multiple ribs admitted to the Department of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery of Suixi County People’s Hospital from March 2018 to May 2020. A retrospective study was carried out on patients with multiple rib fractures as the object of this study, including 62 males and 36 females; aged 21-72 years with average (45.3±9.7) years. According to the random number table method, the research objects were divided into internal fixation group and conservative group. There were 49 cases. Patients in the internal fixation group received internal fixation treatment, and the conservative group received conservative treatment. The clinical effects of treatments were compared. Differences in efficacy indicators (hospital time, pain relief time and fracture healing time) and the incidence of complications were analyzed.

The length of hospital stay in the internal fixation group (14.7±4.1) d, pain relief time (9. 4±2.2) d, fracture healing time (56. 2±5.8) d and the incidence of complications 22.4% (11/49) vs. 4.1% (2/49) were significantly lower than those in the non-surgical group (24±6.2) d, (13.5±5.2) d, (85.2±8.3) d, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

For multiple rib fractures, the effect of internal fixation treatment for the patients is significant, which can not only effectively promote the recovery of patients, but also speed up the relief of patients' pain sensation and reduce the incidence of complications