切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 205 -210. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2022.04.003

论著

高频重复经颅磁刺激联合认知行为治疗对脑卒中后焦虑和抑郁共病状态患者的影响
陈芸1, 张乔阳2, 张敏3, 曹音2, 董贯忠2, 恽文伟3, 杨海燕1, 张伟媛3,()   
  1. 1. 213000 江苏常州,南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院神经内科;213000 江苏常州,南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院康复科
    2. 213000 江苏常州,南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院心理科
    3. 213000 江苏常州,南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-13 出版日期:2022-08-18
  • 通信作者: 张伟媛
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生健康委科研面上项目(H2019051); 常州市卫生健康青苗人才培养工程(CZQM2020073)

Effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive behavioral therapy on patients with anxiety and depression comorbidities after stroke

Yun Chen1, Qiaoyang Zhang2, Min Zhang3, Yin Cao2, Guanzhong Dong2, Wenwei Yun3, Haiyan Yang1, Weiyuan Zhang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology, Changzhou Second People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213000, China; Department of Rehabilitation, Changzhou Second People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213000, China
    2. Department of Psychology, Changzhou Second People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213000, China
    3. Department of Neurology, Changzhou Second People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213000, China
  • Received:2022-05-13 Published:2022-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Weiyuan Zhang
引用本文:

陈芸, 张乔阳, 张敏, 曹音, 董贯忠, 恽文伟, 杨海燕, 张伟媛. 高频重复经颅磁刺激联合认知行为治疗对脑卒中后焦虑和抑郁共病状态患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 205-210.

Yun Chen, Qiaoyang Zhang, Min Zhang, Yin Cao, Guanzhong Dong, Wenwei Yun, Haiyan Yang, Weiyuan Zhang. Effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive behavioral therapy on patients with anxiety and depression comorbidities after stroke[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(04): 205-210.

目的

观察高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合认知行为治疗对脑卒中后焦虑(PSA)、脑卒中后抑郁(PSD)共病状态患者的影响。

方法

采用随机数字表法将160例脑卒中后焦虑抑郁状态患者分为对照组和观察组。两组患者均给予脑卒中常规治疗、抗抑郁药物治疗和认知行为治疗,对照组同时给予高频rTMS假刺激治疗,观察组则给予高频rTMS真刺激治疗。观察4周后2组患者抑郁症状、焦虑症状、睡眠质量、日常生活能力改善情况。

结果

两组患者汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分、匹兹堡睡眠指数量表(PSQI)、改良Barthel指数(MBI)在治疗前差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。治疗4周后,对照组和观察组的HAMD评分、HAMA评分、PSQI较治疗前下降,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),其中观察组下降更为明显,与对照组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组和观察组MBI与治疗前相比,均有明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而观察组和对照组相比,观察组分数提高更显著,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗有效率为87.50%,高于对照组的71.25%。两组之间差异有统计学意义(Uc=-3.45,P<0.001)。

结论

高频rTMS治疗联合认知行为治疗和认知行为治疗均能有效改善PSA+PSD患者的焦虑抑郁症状、睡眠质量及日常生活能力,但高频rTMS治疗联合认知行为治疗的效果更加明显。

Objective

To observe the effect of high-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and cognitive behavioral treatment on patients with comorbid post-stroke anxiety (PSA) and post-stroke depression (PSD).

Methods

A total of 160 patients with anxiety and depression after stroke were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method. All patients in 2 groups were given routine treatment for stroke, antidepressant therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. The control group was also given high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation sham stimulation, and the observation group was given high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation true stimulation. After 4 weeks, the improvement of depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, sleep quality, and daily life ability in group 2 patients were observed.

Results

At baseline, there were no significant differences in the Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) score, Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) score, Pittsburgh sleep index number scale (PSQI) score, and modified Barthel index (MBI score) (P>0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, HAMD score, HAMA score and PSQI score all decreased compared with the treatment before. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The MBI score of the control group and the observation group was significantly improved compared with that before treatment, with statistical significance (P<0.05), while the score of the observation group was significantly improved compared with that of the control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The treatment effective rate of the observation group was 87.50%, which was higher than that of the control group (71.25%). There was a significant difference between the two groups (Uc=-3.45, P=0.001).

Conclusion

High frequency repetition and cognitive behavior therapy can effectively improve the anxiety and depression, but the quality of repeated TMS treatment and cognitive behavior treatment is more obvious, and cognitive behavior treatment may take longer time and is related to the patient’s own comprehension ability.

表1 入组时两组患者一般资料情况比较
表2 两组患者治疗前后HAMD评分、HAMA评分、PSQI评分、MBI评分比较(分,±s)
表3 两组患者治疗后治疗有效率比较[例(%)]
1
王少石,周新雨,朱春燕.卒中后抑郁临床实践的中国专家共识[J].中国卒中杂志201611(8):685-693.
2
河南省卒中学会卒中后心理与情感障碍分会,河南省医师协会精神科分会,河南省心理卫生协会,等.脑卒中后抑郁临床诊疗指南[J].临床心身疾病杂志202026(3):后插1-5,封3.
3
Schneider MA, Schneider MD.Recognizing poststroke depression[J].Nursing201242(12):60-63.
4
王思博,王慧彬,曲慧玲,等.卒中后抑郁的影响因素及其对生活质量的影响[J].中国医科大学学报201746(9):844-847.
5
Lee AC, Tang SW, Yu GK,et al.Incidence and predictors of depression after stroke(DAS)[J].Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract200711(3):200-206.
6
Ayerbe L, Ayis SA, Crichton S,et al.Natural history,predictors and associated outcomes of anxiety up to 10 years after stroke:the South London Stroke Register[J].Age Ageing201443(4):542-547.
7
李丽君,胡卫疆,高雅坤,等.抗抑郁药联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗卒中后抑郁的meta分析[J].中国心理卫生志201731(4):274-277.
8
Donse L, Padberg F, Sack AT,et al.Simultaneous rTMS and psychotherapy in major depressive disorder:Clinical outcomes and predictors from a large naturalistic study[J].Brain Stimul201811(2):337-345.
9
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J].中华神经科杂志201851(9):666-682.
10
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国脑出血诊治指南(2014)[J].中华神经科杂志201548(6):435-444.
11
中华医学会精神科分会.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].三版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:87.
12
汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生出版社,1999:220-223.
13
汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生出版社,1999:253-255.
14
汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生出版社,1999:375-378.
15
张作记.行为医学量表手册[M].北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2005:292-293.
16
朱梅芳,王春雪.以认知行为治疗综合管理卒中后抑郁伴失眠患者病例报道[J].中国卒中杂志201813(5):504-507.
17
袁秀霞,童永胜,陈景旭,等.团体认知行为治疗对抑郁症患者社会功能的改善作用[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志201726(4):327-330.
18
谭友果,刘波,何瑞妮,等.短程团体认知行为治疗个体认知行为治疗联合艾斯西酞普兰与单用艾斯西酞普兰治疗老年抑郁症120例临床疗效分析[J].山西医药杂志201746(13):1530-1533.
19
范思海,孙学礼,郑重,等.重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症的研究进展[J].华西医学200823(1):172-173.
20
陈静,张红波,张长国,等.高频与低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗帕金森病抑郁的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志201537(11):838-841.
21
杨柳,刘玉山,刘兰祥,等.不同频率重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后抑郁障碍的疗效观察[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志2014(22):18-20.
22
恽晓平.康复疗法评定学[M].北京:华夏出版社,2005:432-434.
23
梅峰,孙树印,张作记,等.5-羟色胺系统与卒中后抑郁[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志201524(4):360-363.
24
Göthe F, Enache D, Wahlund LO,et al.Cerebrovascular diseases and depression:epidemiology,mechanisms and treatment[J].Panminerva Med201254(3):161-170.
25
Hackett ML, Köhler S, O'Brien JT,et al.Neuro-psychiatric outcomes of strock[J].Lancet Neural201413(5):525-534.
26
Schöttke H, Giabbiconi CM.Post-stroke depression and post-stroke anxiety:prevalence and predictors[J].Int Psychogeriatr201527(11):1805-1812.
27
Cumming TB, Blomstrand C, Skoog I,et al.The high prevalence of anxiety disorders after stroke[J].Am J Geriatr Psychiatry201624(2):154-160.
28
Fure B, Wyller TB, Engedal K,et al.Emotional symptoms in acute ischemic stroke[J].Int J Geriatr Psychiatry200621(4):382-387.
29
刘永珍,于逢春,尹静,等.脑卒中后抑郁状态对预后的影响:7年随访[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志201036(5):292-295.
30
Loubinoux I, Kronenberg G, Endres M,et al.Post-stroke depression:mechanisms,translation and therapy[J].J Cell Mol Med201216(9):1961-1969.
31
康岚,王希林,刘粹,等.卒中后抑郁患者心理社会影响因素的对照研究[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志2014(6):357-361.
32
Brown C, Hasson H, Thyselius V,et al.Post-stroke depression and functional independence:a conundrum[J].Acta Neurol Scand2012126(1):45-51.
33
Kim JS.Post-stroke mood and emotional disturbances:pharmacological therapy based on mechanisms[J].J Stroke201618(3):244-255.
34
Knapp P, Campbell Burton CA, Holmes J,et al.Interventions for treating anxiety after stroke[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev20175(5):CD008860.
35
Das J, GKR.Post stroke depression:The sequelae of cerebral stroke[J].Neurosci Biobehav Rev2018(90):104-114.
36
Lefaucheur JP, André-Obadia N, Antal A,et al.Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)[J].Clin Neurophysiol2014125(11):2150-2206.
37
Kimbrell TA, Little JT, Dunn RT,et al.Frequency dependence of antidepressant response to left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)as a function of baseline cerebral glucose metabolism[J].Biol Psychiatry199946(12):1603-1613.
38
Nobler MS, Teneback CC, Nahas Z,et al.Structural and functional neuroimaging of electroconvulsive therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation[J].Depress Anxiety200012(3):144-156.
39
Hovington CL, McGirr A, Lepage M,et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression and schizophrenia:a systematic review of recent meta-analyses[J].Ann Med201345(4):308-321.
40
Vedeniapin A, Cheng L, George MS.Feasibility of simultaneous cognitive behavioral therapy and left prefrontal rTMS for treatment resistant depression[J].Brain Stimul20103(4):207-210.
41
Cuijpers P, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E,et al.Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression:meta-analytic study of publication bias[J].Br J Psychiatry2010196(3):173-178.
42
Kamenov K, Twomey C, Cabello M,et al.The efficacy of psychotherapy,pharmacotherapy and their combination on functioning and quality of life in depression:a meta-analysis[J].Psychol Med201747(3):414-425.
43
Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Daskalakis ZJ.High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates and enhances the clinical response to antidepressants in major depression:a meta-analysis of randomized,double-blind, and sham-controlled trials[J].J Clin Psychiatry201374(2):e122-e129.
44
黄平,杨盛洲,李华,等.重复经颅磁刺激联合认知行为治疗对产后抑郁的疗效分析[J].中华精神科杂志201649(6):404-409.
45
Ridding MC, Rothwell JC.Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?[J].Nat Rev Neurosci20078(7):559-567.
46
Yoshimura S, Okamoto Y, Matsunaga M,et al.Cognitive behavioral therapy changes functional connectivity between medial prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices[J].J Affect Disord2017208:610-614.
47
Clark L, Chamberlain SR, Sahakian BJ.Neurocognitive mechanisms in depression: implications for treatment[J].Annu Rev Neurosci2009;32:57-74.
48
Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH,et al.Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications[J].Brain2011134(Pt 6):1591-1609.
[1] 张熙东, 贾贺杰, 冯锐, 李路亚, 乔永志, 郑颖. 急诊患者家属焦虑的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 319-324.
[2] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[3] 高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.
[4] 杜晨阳, 王勇, 段鑫, 柯文杰, 石念, 武英翔, 罗文. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术后吞咽困难的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 523-527.
[5] 江西省神经外科质量控制中心. 江西省心源性脑卒中多学科协作防治专家共识[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 264-277.
[6] 张洪, 杨琪, 罗静, 唐茜, 邓鸿, 巩文艳, 王丽坤, 刘静, 艾双春. 多靶点神经调控技术对卒中后上肢运动功能障碍患者的脑网络功能连接研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 278-284.
[7] 许方军, 曹晓光, 王修敏, 王婷, 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 张鹤言. 基于闭环理论的动作观察疗法联合躯干控制训练对脑卒中后下肢运动的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 292-299.
[8] 白杰, 王唯一, 陈超, 王帆, 肖新如. 神经外科住培医师职业倦怠及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 662-670.
[9] 耿晓坤. 缺血性卒中后无效再灌注的时间窗、组织窗与神经保护[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 636-636.
[10] 郑屹, 刘莹, 张煜坤, 李广平, 陈康寅, 刘彤. 既往及新发心房颤动对急性心肌梗死患者远期卒中风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 406-417.
[11] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[12] 王丽娜, 吕书霞, 李亚男. 脑卒中偏瘫患者健康焦虑元认知与疾病接受度、恐惧疾病进展的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 434-440.
[13] 穆巴拉克·伊力哈, 徐霁华, 鲁明. 急性轻型卒中微量脑出血误诊病例的临床特点及影像学表现分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-445.
[14] 金安松, 邹玉松, 刘玖涛, 薛凤麟, 庞爱兰. 孤立性颅内浆细胞瘤一例及相关文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 495-500.
[15] 李璇, 邓岚, 郭微, 邓永梅, 刘杰昕. 标准化皮肤管理流程在防治脑卒中患者失禁相关性皮炎中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要