切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 204 -208. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2023.04.003

论著

脓毒性休克1 h集束化治疗在急诊中的实施情况及预后分析
毛进, 张晨, 高娜, 夏泽燕, 吴宗盛()   
  1. 210009 南京,东南大学附属中大医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-25 出版日期:2023-08-18
  • 通信作者: 吴宗盛
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82002091)

Implementation ofsepsis 1- hour bundle strategy for patients with septic shock in emergency department: a prognosis analysis

Jin Mao, Chen Zhang, Na Gao, Zeyan Xia, Zongsheng Wu()   

  1. Department of Emergency, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2023-07-25 Published:2023-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Zongsheng Wu
引用本文:

毛进, 张晨, 高娜, 夏泽燕, 吴宗盛. 脓毒性休克1 h集束化治疗在急诊中的实施情况及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 204-208.

Jin Mao, Chen Zhang, Na Gao, Zeyan Xia, Zongsheng Wu. Implementation ofsepsis 1- hour bundle strategy for patients with septic shock in emergency department: a prognosis analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(04): 204-208.

目的

明确脓毒性休克患者1 h集束化治疗在急诊科的实施情况及其对预后的影响。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列分析,纳入2021年9月1日至2023年8月31日期间东南大学附属中大医院急诊医学科收治的脓毒性休克患者为研究对象。脓毒症、脓毒性休克的诊断标准与1 h集束化治疗措施均按照2021版拯救脓毒症运动(surviving sepsis campaign,SSC)指南确定。按1 h集束化治疗措施是否完全执行到位分为完成组和未完成组,收集患者年龄、性别、基础疾病和预后指标等临床资料,行SOFA评分和APACHEⅡ评分。共526例急诊患者被诊断为脓毒性休克,经筛选后最终纳入316例进行后续分析。统计处置采用SPSS 23.0软件。

结果

研究纳入人群的中位年龄为71.0岁,男性占52.8%。原发感染主要为肺部、胆道系统和腹腔。在纳入的患者中,仅15.5%患者完全执行了1 h集束化治疗,进入完成组;其余84.5%患者均存在不同程度的执行未到位情况,其中液体复苏未执行到位占74.37%(235/267),其次是未在使用抗菌药物前留取了血培养占46.84%(148/267)和未使用广谱抗菌药物占38.61%(122/267)等。本组患者中,住院天数中位数10 d,住院期间病死率为32.8%(104/316)。完成组与未完成组比较,ICU入住率、住院天数和住院病死率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2条以上未完成的住院病死率(35.2%),高于仅一条未完成组(32.5%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

脓毒性休克1 h集束化治疗在急诊实施达标率较低,多条治疗措施未完善与预后不良有关,需加强相关质量管理培训。

Objective

To clearly identify the clinical practice and outcome of 1-hour bundle of sepsis in emergency department.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was carried out in this study. Patients with septic shock who had been admitted to the emergency department of Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University between September 1, 2021 and August 31, 2023 were included. The diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock was according to the criteria of sepsis and septic shock from 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. The study subjects were divided into completed group and incompleted group according to that 1- hour bundle was performed or not. Pertinent clinical data including patients’ age, gender, basic diseases and clinical prognosis were collected. Furthermore, SOFA and APACHEⅡ scoring were performed in each patient. Statistical software SPSS 23.0 was used for analysis.

Results

A total of 526 emergency patients were diagnosed with septic shock during the study period. 316 patients were included in the final analysis after screening. The median age of the whole population was 71.0 years and 52.8% were male. The most frequent primary sites of infection were pulmonary, the biliary system and the abdomen. In enrolled patients, the 1-hour bundle was performed in only 15.5% who were included in the completed group. Among the remaining patients, there was one and more treatments was not finished. Fluid resuscitation(74.37%, 235/267) ranked the first place. Secondly, blood culture was conducted before using antibiotics(46.84%, 148/267). Broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents using was the third common unfinished treatment. A total of 104 (32.8%) patients with septic shock died during hospitalization and the median length of hospital stay was 10 days. There were no significant statistical differences in ICU hospitalization, length of hospital stay and hospital mortality between the completed group and the incompleted group. Compared with only one therapy unfinished group, the hospital mortality of two or more unfinished group was increased(35.2% vs. 32.5%), but without statistical differences hospital mortality (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The compliance rate of sepsis 1- hour bundle therapyis still relatively low in emergency department. A poor prognosis may be associated with delays to the initiation of 1-hour bundle therapy. Improvements require further training and quality management for sepsis 1-hour bundle therapy.

图1 本研究患者纳入流程图
表1 两组急诊入院的脓毒性休克患者临床基本特征[例(%)]
表2 未完成组项目分布
表3 两组患者预后比较[例(%)]
1
Rudd KEJohnson SCAgesa KM,et al.Global,regional,and national sepsis incidence and mortality,1990-2017:analysis for the global burden of disease study[J].Lancet2020395(10219):200-211.
2
Pruinelli LWestra BLYadav P,et al.Delay within the 3-hour surviving sepsis campaign guideline on mortality for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock[J].Crit Care Med201846(4):500-505.
3
钱淑媛,李雪珠,周洁,等.医护人员执行脓毒症1 h集束化治疗管理体系的依从性研究初探[J].中华内科杂志202261(1):104-107.
4
徐亮,高志伟,吴魏芹,等.急诊脓毒性休克患者1 h集束化治疗策略临床实施依从性的观察[J].中华全科医师杂志202221(1):42-47.
5
Levy MMEvans LERhodes A.The surviving sepsis campaign bundle:2018 update[J].Intensive Care Med201844(6):925-928.
6
Husabø GNilsen RMFlaatten H,et al.Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments,time to treatment,and association with mortality:an observational study[J].PLoS One202015(1):e227652.
7
Park SJeon KOh DK,et al.Normothermia in patients with sepsis who present to emergency departments is associated with low compliance with sepsis bundles and increased in-hospital mortality rate[J].Crit Care Med202048(10):1462-1470.
8
Barbash IJDavis BKahn JM.National performance on the medicare SEP-1 sepsis quality measure[J].Crit Care Med201947(8):1026-1032.
9
Rhodes APhillips GBeale R,et al.The surviving sepsis campaign bundles and outcome:results from the international multicentre prevalence study on sepsis (the IMPreSS study)[J].Intensive Care Med201541(9):1620-1628.
10
Kushimoto SAbe TOgura H,et al.Impact of body temperature abnormalities on the implementation of sepsis bundles and outcomes in patients with severe sepsis:a retrospective sub-analysis of the focused outcome research on emergency care for acute respiratory distress syndrome,sepsis and trauma study[J].Crit Care Med201947(5):691-699.
11
Seymour CWGesten FPrescott HC,et al.Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis[J].N Engl J Med2017376(23): 2235-2244.
12
Ammar MAAmmar AAWieruszewski PM,et al.Timing of vasoactive agents andcorticosteroid initiation in septic shock[J].Ann Intensive Care202212(1):47.
13
Peltan IDBledsoe JROniki TA,et al.Emergency department crowding is associated with delayed antibiotics for sepsis[J].Ann Emerg Med201973(4):345-355.
14
Gaieski DFAgarwal AKMikkelsen ME,et al.The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis[J].Am J Emerg Med201735(7):953-960.
15
Mccarthy ML.Overcrowding in emergency departments and adverse outcomes [J].BMJ2011(342):d2830.
16
Andrews BSemler MWMuchemwa L,et al.Effect of an early resuscitation protocol on in-hospital mortality among adults with sepsis and hypotension:a randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA2017318(13):1233-1240.
17
Zhou YWang YLi Q,et al.The effects of early restrictive fluid resuscitation on the clinical outcomes in sepsis patients[J].Am J Transl Res202113(10):11482 -11490.
18
Shapiro NIDouglas ISBrower RG,et al.Early restrictive or liberal fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension[J].N Engl J Med2023388(6): 499-510.
19
彭锦,关凤华,李淑媛,等.提高重症医学科脓毒性休克患者6h集束化治疗达标率[J].中国卫生质量管理201724(4):68-71.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[6] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[7] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[8] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[9] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[10] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[11] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[12] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[13] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[14] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?