切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 204 -208. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2023.04.003

论著

脓毒性休克1 h集束化治疗在急诊中的实施情况及预后分析
毛进, 张晨, 高娜, 夏泽燕, 吴宗盛()   
  1. 210009 南京,东南大学附属中大医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-25 出版日期:2023-08-18
  • 通信作者: 吴宗盛
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82002091)

Implementation ofsepsis 1- hour bundle strategy for patients with septic shock in emergency department: a prognosis analysis

Jin Mao, Chen Zhang, Na Gao, Zeyan Xia, Zongsheng Wu()   

  1. Department of Emergency, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2023-07-25 Published:2023-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Zongsheng Wu
引用本文:

毛进, 张晨, 高娜, 夏泽燕, 吴宗盛. 脓毒性休克1 h集束化治疗在急诊中的实施情况及预后分析[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 204-208.

Jin Mao, Chen Zhang, Na Gao, Zeyan Xia, Zongsheng Wu. Implementation ofsepsis 1- hour bundle strategy for patients with septic shock in emergency department: a prognosis analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(04): 204-208.

目的

明确脓毒性休克患者1 h集束化治疗在急诊科的实施情况及其对预后的影响。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列分析,纳入2021年9月1日至2023年8月31日期间东南大学附属中大医院急诊医学科收治的脓毒性休克患者为研究对象。脓毒症、脓毒性休克的诊断标准与1 h集束化治疗措施均按照2021版拯救脓毒症运动(surviving sepsis campaign,SSC)指南确定。按1 h集束化治疗措施是否完全执行到位分为完成组和未完成组,收集患者年龄、性别、基础疾病和预后指标等临床资料,行SOFA评分和APACHEⅡ评分。共526例急诊患者被诊断为脓毒性休克,经筛选后最终纳入316例进行后续分析。统计处置采用SPSS 23.0软件。

结果

研究纳入人群的中位年龄为71.0岁,男性占52.8%。原发感染主要为肺部、胆道系统和腹腔。在纳入的患者中,仅15.5%患者完全执行了1 h集束化治疗,进入完成组;其余84.5%患者均存在不同程度的执行未到位情况,其中液体复苏未执行到位占74.37%(235/267),其次是未在使用抗菌药物前留取了血培养占46.84%(148/267)和未使用广谱抗菌药物占38.61%(122/267)等。本组患者中,住院天数中位数10 d,住院期间病死率为32.8%(104/316)。完成组与未完成组比较,ICU入住率、住院天数和住院病死率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2条以上未完成的住院病死率(35.2%),高于仅一条未完成组(32.5%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

脓毒性休克1 h集束化治疗在急诊实施达标率较低,多条治疗措施未完善与预后不良有关,需加强相关质量管理培训。

Objective

To clearly identify the clinical practice and outcome of 1-hour bundle of sepsis in emergency department.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was carried out in this study. Patients with septic shock who had been admitted to the emergency department of Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University between September 1, 2021 and August 31, 2023 were included. The diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock was according to the criteria of sepsis and septic shock from 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. The study subjects were divided into completed group and incompleted group according to that 1- hour bundle was performed or not. Pertinent clinical data including patients’ age, gender, basic diseases and clinical prognosis were collected. Furthermore, SOFA and APACHEⅡ scoring were performed in each patient. Statistical software SPSS 23.0 was used for analysis.

Results

A total of 526 emergency patients were diagnosed with septic shock during the study period. 316 patients were included in the final analysis after screening. The median age of the whole population was 71.0 years and 52.8% were male. The most frequent primary sites of infection were pulmonary, the biliary system and the abdomen. In enrolled patients, the 1-hour bundle was performed in only 15.5% who were included in the completed group. Among the remaining patients, there was one and more treatments was not finished. Fluid resuscitation(74.37%, 235/267) ranked the first place. Secondly, blood culture was conducted before using antibiotics(46.84%, 148/267). Broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents using was the third common unfinished treatment. A total of 104 (32.8%) patients with septic shock died during hospitalization and the median length of hospital stay was 10 days. There were no significant statistical differences in ICU hospitalization, length of hospital stay and hospital mortality between the completed group and the incompleted group. Compared with only one therapy unfinished group, the hospital mortality of two or more unfinished group was increased(35.2% vs. 32.5%), but without statistical differences hospital mortality (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The compliance rate of sepsis 1- hour bundle therapyis still relatively low in emergency department. A poor prognosis may be associated with delays to the initiation of 1-hour bundle therapy. Improvements require further training and quality management for sepsis 1-hour bundle therapy.

图1 本研究患者纳入流程图
表1 两组急诊入院的脓毒性休克患者临床基本特征[例(%)]
表2 未完成组项目分布
表3 两组患者预后比较[例(%)]
1
Rudd KEJohnson SCAgesa KM,et al.Global,regional,and national sepsis incidence and mortality,1990-2017:analysis for the global burden of disease study[J].Lancet2020395(10219):200-211.
2
Pruinelli LWestra BLYadav P,et al.Delay within the 3-hour surviving sepsis campaign guideline on mortality for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock[J].Crit Care Med201846(4):500-505.
3
钱淑媛,李雪珠,周洁,等.医护人员执行脓毒症1 h集束化治疗管理体系的依从性研究初探[J].中华内科杂志202261(1):104-107.
4
徐亮,高志伟,吴魏芹,等.急诊脓毒性休克患者1 h集束化治疗策略临床实施依从性的观察[J].中华全科医师杂志202221(1):42-47.
5
Levy MMEvans LERhodes A.The surviving sepsis campaign bundle:2018 update[J].Intensive Care Med201844(6):925-928.
6
Husabø GNilsen RMFlaatten H,et al.Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments,time to treatment,and association with mortality:an observational study[J].PLoS One202015(1):e227652.
7
Park SJeon KOh DK,et al.Normothermia in patients with sepsis who present to emergency departments is associated with low compliance with sepsis bundles and increased in-hospital mortality rate[J].Crit Care Med202048(10):1462-1470.
8
Barbash IJDavis BKahn JM.National performance on the medicare SEP-1 sepsis quality measure[J].Crit Care Med201947(8):1026-1032.
9
Rhodes APhillips GBeale R,et al.The surviving sepsis campaign bundles and outcome:results from the international multicentre prevalence study on sepsis (the IMPreSS study)[J].Intensive Care Med201541(9):1620-1628.
10
Kushimoto SAbe TOgura H,et al.Impact of body temperature abnormalities on the implementation of sepsis bundles and outcomes in patients with severe sepsis:a retrospective sub-analysis of the focused outcome research on emergency care for acute respiratory distress syndrome,sepsis and trauma study[J].Crit Care Med201947(5):691-699.
11
Seymour CWGesten FPrescott HC,et al.Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis[J].N Engl J Med2017376(23): 2235-2244.
12
Ammar MAAmmar AAWieruszewski PM,et al.Timing of vasoactive agents andcorticosteroid initiation in septic shock[J].Ann Intensive Care202212(1):47.
13
Peltan IDBledsoe JROniki TA,et al.Emergency department crowding is associated with delayed antibiotics for sepsis[J].Ann Emerg Med201973(4):345-355.
14
Gaieski DFAgarwal AKMikkelsen ME,et al.The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis[J].Am J Emerg Med201735(7):953-960.
15
Mccarthy ML.Overcrowding in emergency departments and adverse outcomes [J].BMJ2011(342):d2830.
16
Andrews BSemler MWMuchemwa L,et al.Effect of an early resuscitation protocol on in-hospital mortality among adults with sepsis and hypotension:a randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA2017318(13):1233-1240.
17
Zhou YWang YLi Q,et al.The effects of early restrictive fluid resuscitation on the clinical outcomes in sepsis patients[J].Am J Transl Res202113(10):11482 -11490.
18
Shapiro NIDouglas ISBrower RG,et al.Early restrictive or liberal fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension[J].N Engl J Med2023388(6): 499-510.
19
彭锦,关凤华,李淑媛,等.提高重症医学科脓毒性休克患者6h集束化治疗达标率[J].中国卫生质量管理201724(4):68-71.
[1] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[2] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[3] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[4] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[5] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[6] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[7] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[8] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[9] 张维志, 刘连新. 基于生物信息学分析IPO7在肝癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 694-701.
[10] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
[11] 蒲蕾, 冯韵霖, 洪大情, 何强, 李贵森, 陈瑾. 蛋白质-能量消耗对血液透析患者预后的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1051-1057.
[12] 李越, 周祺祺, 赵洪猛. 初诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌的外科治疗进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1097-1101.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(09): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要