切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 173 -178. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2026.03.008

论著

孕产妇难治性产后出血风险列线图的探索性构建与初步验证
陈洋†(), 于书琪   
  1. 317000 浙江临海,临海市妇幼保健院产科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-15 出版日期:2026-06-18
  • 通信作者: 陈洋

Construction and validation of nomograms for the risk of refractory postpartum hemorrhage

Yang Chen†(), Shuqi Yu   

  1. Department of Obstetrics, Linhai Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Linhai 317000, China
  • Received:2025-09-15 Published:2026-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Yang Chen
引用本文:

陈洋, 于书琪. 孕产妇难治性产后出血风险列线图的探索性构建与初步验证[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2026, 12(03): 173-178.

Yang Chen, Shuqi Yu. Construction and validation of nomograms for the risk of refractory postpartum hemorrhage[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2026, 12(03): 173-178.

目的

探索性构建孕产妇难治性产后出血的风险预测模型,并初步评价其预测效能。

方法

选取临海市妇幼保健院2024年1月1日至2025年1月1日临海市妇幼保健院收治的符合纳入、排除标准的500例孕产妇患者,年龄20~42岁[(30.71±5.02)岁]。再按照7∶3比例随机划分为训练组(n=350)和验证组(n=150),评估训练组患者出现难治性产后出血情况,分为难治性产后出血组(n=32)和无难治性产后出血组(n=318)。识别孕产妇难治性产后出血发生的风险因素,构建Nomogram预测模型,受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)衡量模型的预测准确性,临床决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型的临床效用。

结果

两组患者瘢痕子宫史、前置胎盘、胎盘早剥、胎盘粘连/植入/穿透、凝血功能障碍、宫缩乏力、产前血清凝血因子Ⅶ(FⅦ)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic分析显示,瘢痕子宫史、前置胎盘、胎盘早剥、胎盘粘连/植入/穿透、凝血功能障碍、宫缩乏力、产前FⅦ≥161 U、产前FIB≥3.0 g/L是孕产妇发生难治性产后出血的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。Nomogram模型应用于训练组、验证组的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.862(95%CI:0.833~0.925)、0.834(95%CI:0.754~0.887),ROC曲线分析确定最优截断值为风险概率28%,该阈值下训练组的灵敏度、特异性分别为81.17%和78.64%,验证组分别为75.33%和72.54%。DCA分析显示,当临床决策者设定的阈值概率为28%时,模型较全干预或无干预策略具有更高的净获益,提示其具有一定的临床决策价值。

结论

孕产妇难治性产后出血发生与瘢痕子宫史、前置胎盘、胎盘早剥、胎盘粘连/植入/穿透、凝血功能障碍、宫缩乏力、产前FⅦ、产前FIB等因素有关,构建预测模型可为后续开展高危人群风险评估及干预研究提供参考。

Objective

To explore and construct a risk prediction model for refractory postpartum hemorrhage in postpartum women and to preliminarily evaluate its predictive efficacy.

Methods

A total of 500 postpartum patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were admitted to Linhai Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025 were selected as the study subjects, aged 20~42 years [(30.71±5.02) years]. They were randomly divided into a training group (n=350) and a validation group (n=150) in a 7∶3 ratio. The incidence of refractory postpartum hemorrhage in the training group was assessed, and patients were divided into a refractory postpartum hemorrhage group (n=32) and a non-refractory postpartum hemorrhage group (n=318). Risk factors for refractory postpartum hemorrhage were identified, and a Nomogram prediction model was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to measure the predictive accuracy of the model, and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the model.

Results

There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in history of scarred uterus, placenta previa, placental abruption, placental adhesion/invasion/penetration, coagulation dysfunction, uterine atony, prenatal serum coagulation factor Ⅶ (FⅦ) and fibrinogen (FIB) (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of scarred uterus, placenta previa, placental abruption, placental adhesion/implantation/penetration, coagulation dysfunction, uterine atony, prenatal FVII≥161 U, and prenatal FIB≥3.0 g/L were independent risk factors for refractory postpartum hemorrhage in women who had given birth (P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram model was 0.862 (95%CI: 0.833-0.925) in the training group and 0.834 (95%CI: 0.754-0.887) in the validation group. ROC curve analysis determined an optimal risk probability cutoff of 28%. At this threshold, the sensitivity and specificity were 81.17% and 78.64% in the training group, and 75.33% and 72.54% in the validation group, respectively. DCA analysis showed that when the threshold probability set by clinical decision-makers was 28%, the model had a higher net benefit than the full-intervention or no-intervention strategy, suggesting that it has certain clinical decision-making value.

Conclusion

The occurrence of refractory postpartum hemorrhage in postpartum women is associated with factors such as history of scarred uterus, placenta previa, placental abruption, placental adhesion/implantation/penetration, coagulation dysfunction, uterine atony, FVII, and FIB. Constructing a predictive model can provide a reference for subsequent risk assessment and intervention studies of high-risk groups.

表1 孕产妇发生难治性产后出血的单因素分析[例(%),±s]
临床资料 无难治性产后出血组(n=318) 难治性产后出血组(n=32) t/χ2值 P值
年龄(岁) 29.53±4.23 30.84±5.12 1.64 >0.05
产时BMI(kg/m2) 26.83±3.52 27.43±3.91 0.91 >0.05
文化程度        
高中及以下 185(58.18) 22(68.75) 1.35 >0.05
本科及以上 133(41.82) 10(31.25)
孕次        
1次 132(41.51) 10(31.25) 1.27 >0.05
≥2次 186(58.49) 22(68.75)
产次        
≤1次 245(77.04) 27(84.38) 0.90 >0.05
≥2次 73(22.96) 5(15.62)
瘢痕子宫史        
有 55(17.30) 20(62.50) 35.29 <0.05
无 263(82.70) 12(37.50)
早产史        
有 50(15.72) 5(15.63) 0.00 >0.05
无 268(84.28) 27(84.38)
孕周        
<38周 58(18.24) 10(31.25) 3.14 >0.05
38~42周 260(81.76) 22(68.75)
分娩方式        
阴道分娩 205(64.47) 20(62.50) 0.05 >0.05
剖宫产 113(35.53) 12(37.50)
胎先露        
头位 254(79.87) 26(81.25) 0.03 >0.05
非头位 64(20.13) 6(18.75)
孕期阴道流血        
有 50(15.72) 6(18.75) 0.20 >0.05
无 268(84.28) 26(81.25)
产前感染        
有 49(15.41) 6(18.75) 0.25 >0.05
无 269(84.59) 26(81.25)
妊娠高血压        
有 80(25.16) 12(37.50) 2.29 >0.05
无 238(74.84) 20(62.50)
前置胎盘        
是 30(9.43) 25(78.12) 103.58 <0.05
否 288(90.57) 7(21.88)
胎盘早剥        
是 38(11.95) 17(53.12) 37.22 <0.05
否 280(88.05) 15(46.88)
胎盘粘连/植入/穿透        
是 30(9.43) 25(78.12) 103.58 <0.05
否 288(90.57) 7(21.88)
凝血功能障碍        
是 29(9.12) 26(81.25) 114.21 <0.05
否 289(90.88) 6(18.75)
多胎妊娠        
是 49(15.41) 6(18.75) 0.25 >0.05
否 269(84.59) 26(81.25)
宫缩乏力        
是 40(12.58) 20(62.50) 51.01 <0.05
否 278(87.42) 12(37.50)
软产道损伤        
是 51(16.04) 5(15.62) 0.00 >0.05
否 267(83.96) 27(84.38)
麻醉方式        
全身麻醉 63(19.81) 6(18.75) 0.02 >0.05
椎管内麻醉 255(80.19) 26(81.25)
新生儿体重(g)        
<4 000 240(75.47) 20(62.50) 2.56 >0.05
≥4 000 78(24.53) 12(37.50)
Ca2+(mmol/L) 2.45±0.56 2.30±0.45 1.47 >0.05
产前AngⅡ(ng/L) 50.23±15.45 46.12±20.34 1.39 >0.05
产前FⅦ(U) 142.20±30.34 190.90±30.25 8.66 <0.05
产前FIB(g/L) 2.12±0.98 3.56±1.23 7.73 <0.05
产前D-D(mg/L) 0.60±0.15 0.65±0.20 1.74 >0.05
产前PT(s) 11.44±1.45 11.66±2.34 -0.52 >0.05
产前APTT(s) 27.12±2.45 27.85±2.56 1.60 >0.05
表2 孕产妇发生难治性产后出血的多因素分析
图1 孕产妇发生难治性产后出血的风险因素Nomogram模型注:FIB为纤维蛋白原,FⅦ为血清凝血因子Ⅶ
图2 Nomogram模型应用于验证组的ROC曲线
图3 Nomogram模型在训练组、验证组及全部患者中的DCA曲线
表3 Nomogram模型预测孕产妇发生难治性产后出血的效能分析
[1]
Overton E, D'Alton M, Goffman D. Intrauterine devices in the management of postpartum hemorrhage[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2024, 230(3S): S1076-S1088.
[2]
刘慧强,魏琰平,孟斐,等.血清vWF、MCP-1、GDF-15联合检测对凶险性前置胎盘患者产后出血的预测价值[J].中国医科大学学报, 2025, 54(4): 346-350, 358.
[3]
Butwick A J, Cecconi M, Ortner C, et al. Evidence gaps in the management of intrauterine hemorrhage-control device failure for atonic postpartum hemorrhage[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2025, 80(6): 367-375.
[4]
Patek K, Friedman P. Postpartum hemorrhage:epidemiology, risk factors, and causes[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 66(2): 344-356.
[5]
刘聪,王贝贝,高迪.产后出血危险因素分析及NO、PLT、25(OH)D的预测价值[J].中国计划生育学杂志, 2024, 32(3): 685-689.
[6]
郭蕊,刘涛,苏玺.基于心电图参数、犬尿氨酸代谢物建立精神分裂症共患心血管疾病的列线图模型[J].实用医学杂志, 2025, 41(8): 1205-1211.
[7]
Lin X, Zhou T, Ni J, et al. CT-based whole lung radiomics nomogram: a tool for identifying the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Eur Radiol, 2024, 34(8): 4852-4863.
[8]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组,中华医学会围产医学分会.产后出血预防与处理指南(2023)[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2023, 58(6): 401-409.
[9]
苟兰英,王雪利.双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎联合马来酸麦角新碱治疗剖宫产难治性产后出血的效果及对凝血因子水平的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践, 2024, 9(29): 95-98.
[10]
马一虎,张俊茹,马妍,等.产后出血危险因素回顾性分析及风险预测模型的建立[J].重庆医学, 2023, 52(24): 3723-3729.
[11]
王一枭,李婷,高娅,等.严重产后出血患者紧急子宫切除的危险因素分析及风险预测[J].重庆医学, 2022, 51(4): 579-583.
[12]
吴姗姗,陶丽,殷珊珊,等.瘢痕子宫患者产后出血的预测模型构建[J].现代医学, 2025, 53(5): 810-815.
[13]
Thams A B, Larsen M H, Rasmussen S C, et al. Incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and risk factors for recurrence in the subsequent pregnancy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2023, 307(4): 1217-1224.
[14]
Hu H, Wang L, Gao J, et al. Risk factors of severe postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant women with placenta previa or low-lying placenta: a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2024, 24(1): 674.
[15]
刘倩,索黎明.凶险性前置胎盘孕妇产后大出血风险预测模型的建立与验证[J].重庆医学, 2024, 53(6): 838-843, 849.
[16]
向金凤,王一枭,贾瑞喆.重度子痫前期发生产后出血的危险因素分析[J].重庆医学, 2025, 54(1): 148-152, 157.
[17]
张靖霄,张志敏,张家颖,等.胎盘植入性疾病患者发生严重产后出血的影响因素及预测模型效能研究[J].临床误诊误治, 2025, 38(10): 81-86.
[18]
李艳鸾,张苑艳,黄启芸,等.经产妇经阴道分娩产后出血风险列线图模型的建立及验证[J].中国性科学, 2024, 33(2): 109-114.
[19]
Zouaghi C, Chaouch M A, Sanchez S, et al. Hysteroscopy after conservative surgical treatment of severe postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony: a systematic literature review[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2023, 162(2): 462-471.
[20]
戴毅敏,顾宁,周燕,等.宫腔止血囊用于非前置胎盘剖宫产产后出血的止血效果分析[J].实用妇产科杂志, 2021, 37(4): 281-286.
[21]
梁双依,曲江雪,石慧峰,等.产后出血量与孕产妇不良临床结局的相关性研究[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2025, 60(6): 422-429.
[1] 邬明嫄, 李婷婷, 鲜欣欣, 罗朝阳, 杨青, 卢漫. 基于超微血流成像血管指数的列线图模型诊断肢端黑色素瘤引流区域淋巴结的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(04): 276-282.
[2] 江伟东, 陈博. 早发性可切除胃癌的临床病理特征及预后列线图模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 230-237.
[3] 罗文勇, 黄文龙, 阮沁桐, 蔡莹, 王欣, 吴柱国, 王利玲, 于海兵. 甲状腺癌术后并发低钙血症的发病风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 257-264.
[4] 刘洵, 毕亮, 郎韧, 吴安石. 同种异体原位肝移植术后早期死亡的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 150-156.
[5] 王吉伟, 许治坤, 谢志远, 龚龙波. 胃上部癌与胃下部癌淋巴结转移特征差异及预后相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 427-431.
[6] 夏明宇, 刘光昊, 孙倩男, 刘宾, 王道荣. 基于炎症与营养指标的早发型直肠癌患者预后列线图的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 468-473.
[7] 王中尧, 李敬东. 肝细胞癌术后早期复发危险因素研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 495-500.
[8] 张彬, 王敏, 郑鹏, 冯犁, 李鑫, 赵高平. 早期胃癌淋巴结转移的危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 337-342.
[9] 杨敏, 杜峻峰, 辛林璞. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 352-355.
[10] 李若隐, 罗义, 张雪琳, 雷李凤, 李思丽. MDSCs相关基因在乳腺癌中表达特征分析与风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 366-373.
[11] 谢吉艳, 江志鹏, 何立锐. 复发性腹壁疝的危险因素及治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 471-476.
[12] 王平, 郝天骄, 陈兴宇, 翟俊, 朱文伟, 陈季松. 急性坏疽性胆囊炎临床风险预测模型的建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 760-767.
[13] 郭洋洁, 杨培, 曾新桃, 史瑞籽, 唐易平. 肝内胆管结石肝切除术后胆漏的危险因素分析及预测模型建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 783-790.
[14] 方荣焕, 孟子凡, 李馥彤, 鹿云皓, 杨永生. 肝硬化门静脉高压症脾切除术后并发症研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 642-647.
[15] 高韶华, 徐涛, 宋亮, 雷丽, 王洪伟, 刘宏新. 1994—2023年中国结直肠癌疾病年龄-时期-队列效应及危险因素归因分析——基于GBD 2023研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 321-330.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?