切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 153 -158. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2025.03.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

肺癌患者外周血UA/Cr值、NLR及NT-proBNP对围手术期发生急性心力衰竭的预测价值
杨鹏(), 王莉, 周湘哲, 袁宽道   
  1. 730050 甘肃兰州,甘肃省肿瘤医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-03 出版日期:2025-06-18
  • 通信作者: 杨鹏
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省卫生健康行业科研计划项目(GSWSKY2021-033)

Predictive value of UA/Cr value, NLR and NT-proBNP in peripheral blood of lung cancer patients for acute heart failure in perioperative period

Peng Yang(), Li Wang, Xiangzhe Zhou, Kuandao Yuan   

  1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou 730050, China
  • Received:2025-06-03 Published:2025-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Peng Yang
引用本文:

杨鹏, 王莉, 周湘哲, 袁宽道. 肺癌患者外周血UA/Cr值、NLR及NT-proBNP对围手术期发生急性心力衰竭的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 153-158.

Peng Yang, Li Wang, Xiangzhe Zhou, Kuandao Yuan. Predictive value of UA/Cr value, NLR and NT-proBNP in peripheral blood of lung cancer patients for acute heart failure in perioperative period[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2025, 11(03): 153-158.

目的

探讨外周血尿酸肌酐比值(UA/Cr)结合中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)及N末端B型脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)对肺癌患者围手术期急性心力衰竭(AHF)的预测价值。

方法

选取2022年1月至2024年12月接受肺癌手术治疗患者186例进行回顾性队列研究,其中男性113例,女性73例;年龄41~78岁,平均(61.19±8.41)岁。根据患者围手术期是否发生AHF,分为AHF组(31例)和非AHF(155例),比较两组的临床基线资料,采用多因素回归分析肺癌患者围手术期发生AHF的影响因素,并应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)曲线分析各因素对肺癌患者围手术期发生AHF的预测价值。

结果

两组患者在病理分期、纽约心脏病协会(NYHA)心功能分级、UA/Cr、NLR和NT-proBNP上相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素回归分析显示:血UA/Cr、NLR和NT-proBNP均是肺癌患者围手术期发生AHF的危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示血UA/Cr诊断肺癌患者围手术期AHF的截断值为16.69,AUC为0.829(95% CI0.749~0.909),敏感度为74.20%,特异度为78.70%;NLR截断值为2.205,AUC为0.856(95% CI0.777~0.935),敏感度为90.30%,特异度为66.50%;NT-proBNP截断值为2 099.495 ng/L,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.903(95%CI0.833~0.972),敏感度为71.00%,特异度为98.70%;联合诊断AUC为0.986(95%CI0.970~1.000),敏感度为96.80%,特异度为94.80%。

结论

外周血UA/Cr比值、NLR及NT-proBNP联合诊断对肺癌患者围手术期发生AHF具有一定的预测价值,敏感性和特异性均较高。

Objective

To explore the predictive value of peripheral blood uric acid (UA)/creatinine (Cr) ratio, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in acute heart failure (AHF) during the perioperative period of lung cancer patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 186 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lung cancer from January 2022 to December 2024, including 113 males and 73 females; the age ranged from 41 to 78 years, with an average of (61.19±8.41) years. According to whether patients experienced AHF during the perioperative period, they were divided into AHF group (31 cases) and non AHF group (155 cases). The clinical baseline data of the two groups were compared, and multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of AHF in lung cancer patients during the perioperative period, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to analyze the predictive value of each factor for AHF in lung cancer patients during the perioperative period.

Results

There were significant differences in pathological stage, NYHA cardiac function grade, UA/Cr, NLR and NT-proBNP between two groups (P<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that blood UA/Cr, NLR and NT-proBNP were all risk factors for perioperative AHF in lung cancer patients (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of serum UA/Cr in diagnosing perioperative AHF was 16.69, AUC was 0.829 (95%CI0.749-0.909), sensitivity was 74.20%, and specificity was 78.70%. The cut-off value of NLR was 2.205, AUC was 0.856 (95%CI: 0.777-0.935), sensitivity was 90.30%, and specificity was 66.50%. The cut-off value of NT-proBNP was 2 099.495 ng/L, the area under the working characteristic curve (AUC) of the subjects was 0.903 (95%CI: 0.833-0.972), with a sensitivity of 71.00% and a specificity of 98.70%; The combined diagnostic AUC was 0.986 (95%CI: 0.970-1.000), with a sensitivity of 96.80% and a specificity of 94.80%.

Conclusion

The combined diagnosis of peripheral blood UA/Cr ratio, NLR and NT-proBNP has a certain predictive value for perioperative AHF in lung cancer patients, with high sensitivity and specificity.

表1 两组患者的临床基线数据比较[例(%)]
表2 自变量赋值
表3 多因素回归分析肺癌患者围手术期发生AHF的影响因素
图1 血UA/Cr比值、NLR、NT-proBNP水平以及三者联合预测肺癌患者围手术期AHF的ROC曲线注:UA/Cr为血尿酸肌酐比值,NLR为中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值,NT-proBNP为N末端B型脑钠肽前体
表4 ROC曲线分析血UA/Cr比值、NLR及NT-proBNP水平对肺癌患者围手术期AHF的预测价值
[1]
Bernhardt AM, Copeland H, Deswal A, et al. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/Heart Failure Society of America Guideline on Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2023, 42(4): e1-e64.
[2]
Gigante A, Assanto E, Brigato C, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients with cardiorenal multimorbidity: the role of serum uric acid/serum creatinine ratio[J]. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev, 2025, 32(2): 209-216.
[3]
Maeda D, Kanzaki Y, Sakane K, et al. Prognostic value of the FAN Score, a combination of the fibrosis-4 index, albumin-bilirubin score and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, in patients hospitalized withheart failure[J]. Int Heart J, 2022, 63(6): 1121-1127.
[4]
Bayes-Genis A, Docherty KF, Petrie MC, et al. Practical algorithms for early diagnosis of heart failure and heart stress using NT-proBNP: A clinical consensus statement from the heart failure association of the ESC[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2023, 25(11): 1891-1898.
[5]
中国肺癌防治联盟,中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺癌学组,中国医师协会呼吸医师分会肺癌工作委员会.肺癌筛查与管理中国专家共识[J].国际呼吸杂志, 2019, 39(21): 1604-1615.
[6]
中华医学会心血管病学分会心力衰竭学组,中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018[J].中华心血管病杂志, 2018, 46(10): 760-789.
[7]
赵浩杰,赵华,董晓丽,等.血浆BNP用于评估晚期肺癌患者心力衰竭的价值探讨[J].医师在线, 2024, 14(9): 57-59.
[8]
徐婷,王翠,任建,等. 2型糖尿病人群血尿酸/肌酐比值与代谢综合征及其组分的相关性[J].中国临床研究, 2023, 36(10): 1524-1528.
[9]
陈怡渝,程琳,黄朝晖,等.微小病变型肾病患者血尿酸/血肌酐比值与临床指标及肾脏病理的相关性[J].贵州医科大学学报, 2024, 49(10): 1514-1520, 1535.
[10]
余晓红,李光军,叶亿通.血尿酸/肌酐比值对急性心肌梗死患者心力衰竭发生的预测分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志, 2023, 33(22): 2757-2760.
[11]
郝伟华,金颖,刘红娟,等.外周血尿素氮与肌酐比值联合前白蛋白水平对急性心力衰竭预后不良的预测价值[J].安徽医药, 2024, 28(5): 934-938.
[12]
姚一,张菲斐,周统,等.外周血NLR、MHR对急性心力衰竭患者发生不良心血管事件的预测价值[J].交通医学, 2024, 38(4): 352-356.
[13]
Lee SJ, Kim K, Park HJ. Meta-analysis on the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratioin rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy: prognostic value of pre-and post-chemoradiotherapy neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio[J]. Front Oncol, 2022(12): 778607.
[14]
Urakawa N, Kanaji S, Kato T, et al. Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratioand histological response correlate with prognosis of gastric cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. In Vivo, 2023, 37(1): 378-384.
[15]
Yilmaz R, Yagin FH, Colak C, et al. Analysis of hematological indicators via explainable artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of acute heart failure: a retrospective study[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2024(11): 1285067.
[16]
中国医师协会检验医师分会心血管专家委员会. B型利钠肽及N末端B型利钠肽前体实验室检测与临床应用中国专家共识[J].中华医学杂志, 2022, 102(35): 2738-2754.
[17]
彭娜娜,王小雅,贾启华. AMI后心力衰竭患者血清NT-proBNP水平的变化及其变化差值对患者预后的预测价值[J].海南医学, 2024, 35(7): 973-977.
[18]
雷鑫篪,姚健,张强,等. N末端B型脑钠肽前体水平监测对肺癌患者围手术期急性心力衰竭的临床意义[J].癌症进展, 2024, 22(8): 846-849, 880.
[19]
Werhahn SM, Becker C, Mende M, et al. NT-proBNP as a marker for atrial fibrillation and heart failure in four observational outpatient trials[J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2022, 9(1): 100-109.
[20]
金兆佳,佟爱华,陈远.血清NT-proBNP、sST2及GDF-15联合检测对急性心力衰竭患者预后的临床价值研究[J].国际检验医学杂志, 2025, 46(4): 475-479.
[1] 张蔚, 李运涛, 尚培中, 贾志芳, 张伟, 郭伟林. 腹腔镜根治术治疗转移性胆囊癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 589-590.
[2] 刘晓青, 张又丹, 张雪玲, 戴纪刚, 刘权兴. 数字化患者画像动态症状模型在肺癌术后管理中的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 429-433.
[3] 程颖慧, 孙娟, 杨冬梅, 朱晓俊, 程鹤, 郝月琴. 胸腔镜肺癌根治术后并发症影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 442-446.
[4] 石娟利, 龙小丽, 相庚, 张笑, 师卓维. 非小细胞肺癌患者认知水平与癌因性疲乏的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 452-456.
[5] 赵雅波, 王倩, 闫小龙, 王元勇, 何改花, 郭一泽. 早期非小细胞肺癌患者术前术后血清miR-21 和miR-937-3p表达变化的研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 345-349.
[6] 周玲, 肖颖, 李秋诗, 陈兆毅, 李琪, 吴园明. 亚麻木酚素通过circRNA HIPK3影响非小细胞肺癌A549 细胞凋亡及铁死亡的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 362-368.
[7] 乔鲜丽, 田向阳, 周文雅, 秦泽敏, 郭姗姗, 于俊岩. 循环肿瘤DNA 对非小细胞肺癌术后复发风险的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 395-400.
[8] 王夏, 袁高峰, 卞光利, 贾会军, 韩光, 宋震, 曹主根. 循环肿瘤DNA 预测非小细胞肺癌辅助化疗后复发风险的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 266-272.
[9] 张莉莉, 许峰, 谢勋鹏, 张学良, 季红华, 季雯绯. 贝伐珠单抗辅助化疗非小细胞肺癌的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 284-288.
[10] 曹冬霞, 杨恩艳, 付启梅, 徐心怡, 王荣花, 张静文. 多模式呼吸训练仪结合全程肺康复训练管理在肺癌胸腔镜围术期的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 295-299.
[11] 刘志静, 马婧, 王利颖, 李朋, 张亚楠, 陈童真. 终末期肺癌患者癌因性疲乏及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 310-314.
[12] 吴娟娟, 武海龙. 监测术前NLR、PLR 及SII 水平对全身麻醉下结直肠癌根治术后并发肠梗阻的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 214-218.
[13] 王浩, 黄咪, 李雪琴. SIGIRR、IL-1、Treg/Th17、NLR与急性胰腺炎继发脓毒症病情程度及预后的关联性[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 250-255.
[14] 广东省护理学会肺癌个案管理专业委员会, 广东省医学会肺部肿瘤学分会. 肺癌术后并发皮下气肿患者护理规范管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 180-187.
[15] 沈婉林, 刘福菁, 马娜, 张合, 顾体军. 动态中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与重症肺炎患者发生弥散性血管内凝血的相关性[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 140-146.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?