切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华卫生应急电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 32 -37. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2026.01.007

论著

HFNC联合高压力NPP治疗AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的效果
蒋忠杰, 谈建明()   
  1. 214211 江苏无锡,宜兴市第六人民医院内科
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-03 出版日期:2026-02-18
  • 通信作者: 谈建明

Efficacy of HFNC combined with high-pressure NPP in the treatment of patients with AECOPD complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure

Zhongjie Jiang, Jianming Tan()   

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Yixing Sixth People's Hospital, Wuxi 214211, China
  • Received:2025-06-03 Published:2026-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Jianming Tan
引用本文:

蒋忠杰, 谈建明. HFNC联合高压力NPP治疗AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的效果[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 32-37.

Zhongjie Jiang, Jianming Tan. Efficacy of HFNC combined with high-pressure NPP in the treatment of patients with AECOPD complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2026, 12(01): 32-37.

目的

探讨经鼻高流量氧疗(HFNC)联合高压力无创正压通气(NPPV)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2022年1月至2025年1月被宜兴市第六人民医院呼吸内科收治的90例AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者临床资料,其中男性47例,女性43例;年龄24~69岁[(46.82±7.61)岁]。按照治疗方式分为对照组和观察组,每组各45例,对照组给予高压力NPPV治疗,观察组给予HFNC联合高压力NPPV治疗。对比分析两组患者入院时及治疗3 d后的炎症因子[C反应蛋白(CRP)、白介素-17(IL-17)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)]、肺功能指标[用力肺活量(FVC)、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEVl)、FEVl/FVC]、血气分析指标[动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、二氧化碳(PaCO2)、血液酸碱度(pH值)]水平变化,比较两组患者住院天数、插管率、随访28 d后再入院率及治疗效果。

结果

入院时,两组患者炎症因子CRP、IL-17、TNF-α比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗3 d后,两组患者的CRP、IL-17、TNF-α水平均降低,观察组炎症因子CRP、IL-17、TNF-α均低于对照组(P<0.05)。入院时,两组患者肺功能指标FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗3 d后,两组患者的FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC均升高,观察组肺功能指标FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC均高于对照组(P<0.05)。入院时,两组患者血气分析指标PaO2、PaCO2、pH值比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗3 d后,两组患者的PaO2、pH值均明显升高,PaCO2明显降低,观察组血气分析指标PaO2、pH值均高于对照组,PaCO2则低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组住院天数、插管率、随访28 d后再入院率均短于或低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组临床治疗总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

HFNC联合高压力NPPV对AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者开展治疗,能有效改善患者肺功能指标、血气分析指标,减轻患者炎症反应,治疗效果好,值得推广。

Objective

To explore effects of nasal high flow oxygen therapy (HFNC) combined with high-pressure non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) on inflammatory factors and lung function in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and type II respiratory failure.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the treatment of 90 patients with AECOPD combined with type II respiratory failure admitted to the Respiratory Department of Yixing Sixth People's Hospital from January 2022 to January 2025, among them, there were 47 males and 43 females; their ages ranged from 24 to 69 years, with an average of (46.82±7.61) years. The patients were divided into a control group and an observation group, with 45 patients in each group. The control group received high-pressure NPPV treatment, while the observation group received HFNC combined with high-pressure NPPV treatment. Comparative analysis of inflammatory factors [(C-reactive protein, CRP), (interleukin-17, IL-17), (tumor necrosis factor-α, TNF-α)], pulmonary function indicators [(forced vital capacity, FVC), (forced expiratory volume in the first second, FEV1), FEV1/FVC], and blood gas analysis indicators [(partial pressure of oxygen, PaO2), (partial pressure of carbon dioxide, PaCO2), pH] between two groups of patients upon admission and 3 days after treatment. The changes of CO2 and blood pH levels between the two groups, including length of hospital stay, intubation rate, readmission rate after 28 days of follow-up, and treatment efficacy were compared.

Results

At admission, there was no significant difference in the levels of inflammatory factors CRP, IL-17, and TNF-α between the two groups (P>0.05); after 3 days of treatment, the CRP, IL-17, and TNF-α decreased in both groups of patients, the inflammatory factors CRP, IL-17, and TNF-α in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). At admission, there was no significant difference in the lung function indicators FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC between the two groups (P>0.05); after 3 days of treatment, the FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC of both groups of patients increased,and the lung function indicators FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). At admission, there was no significant difference in the blood gas analysis indicators PaO2, PaCO2, and pH value between the two groups (P>0.05); after 3 days of treatment, the PaO2 and pH values of both groups of patients increased significantly, while the PaCO2 values decreased significantly,the blood gas analysis indicators PaO2 and pH value in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, while PaCO2 was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The observation group had lower hospitalization days, intubation rate, and readmission rate due to the disease after 28 days of follow-up compared to the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate of clinical treatment in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of HFNC and high-pressure NPPV in the treatment of AECOPD patients with type II respiratory failure can effectively improve lung function indicators, blood gas analysis indicators, reduce inflammatory reactions, and has good therapeutic effects, which is worth promoting.

表1 两组患者临床资料比较[例(%)]
表2 两组患者炎症因子水平比较(±s
表3 两组患者肺功能指标比较(±s
表4 两组患者血气指标比较(±s
表5 两组患者临床治疗情况比较[例(%)]
表6 两组患者临床疗效比较[例(%)]
[1]
代义龙,徐小凡,徐小虎,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期发病机制的研究进展[J].临床肺科杂志, 2024, 29(6): 932-936.
[2]
李娅,王海鑫,陈自强,等.合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的AECOPD患者危险因素和临床特征分析[J].国际呼吸杂志, 2024, 44(12): 1401-1408.
[3]
Williams JW Jr, Cox CE, Hargett CW. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) for acute respiratory failure[J] Rockville (MD), 2023, 34(8): 995-1003.
[4]
Schwarz SB, Magnet FS, Windisch W. Why high-intensity NPPV is favourable to low-intensity NPPV: clinical and physiological Reasons[J]. COPD, 2024, 14(4): 389-395.
[5]
唐艳平,兰福全.经鼻高流量氧疗对AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的疗效评价[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2023, 30(5): 547-550.
[6]
王晓娟,方向阳.慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议2019:慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断、治疗与预防全球策略解读[J].中国全科医学, 2019, 22(18): 2141-2149.
[7]
中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等.中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病基层诊疗与管理指南(2024年)[J].中华全科医师杂志, 2024, 23(6): 578-602.
[8]
应琴丽,周世彬,李焕根,等. HFNC与NIPPV对AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者的临床疗效观察[J].北京医学, 2024, 46(3): 204-209.
[9]
卢虎强,王芳.经鼻高流量氧疗与无创正压通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的价值[J].国际呼吸杂志, 2023, 43(1): 93-98.
[10]
周国平,张鑫,刘阳,等.高流量氧疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的疗效分析[J].临床肺科杂志, 2024, 29(5): 665-670.
[11]
于俪超,马莎莎,杨行,等. Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭病人应用高流量湿化氧疗的最佳证据总结[J].护理研究, 2022, 36(9): 1547-1555.
[12]
Barrett NA, Murgolo F, Grasso S. Clinical efficacy of HI-NPPV in the treatment of AECOPD combined with severe type II respiratory failure[J]. COPD, 2023, 22(2): 203-207.
[13]
姜锐,李雪娇,贺银虹,等. HI-NPPV治疗AECOPD合并严重Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的临床疗效[J].中南大学学报(医学版), 2024, 49(2): 266-272.
[14]
黄巧云,查姗姗,关力理,等.无创正压通气临床研究年度进展2024[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2025, 48(2): 154-158.
[15]
中华医学会呼吸病学分会呼吸治疗学组,中国康复医学会呼吸康复专委会呼吸治疗学组,等.家庭无创通气技术应用规范专家共识[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2025, 24(9): 609-627.
[16]
滕文哲,陈虎,石思瑶,等.双水平正压通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭效果的Meta分析与试验序贯分析[J].中国全科医学, 202225(2): 227-235.
[1] 沈振, 周岩. 中间尾侧联合入路腹腔镜系膜切除对右半结肠癌并肠梗阻患者炎症与应激反应的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 34-37.
[2] 郑旭峰, 陈法桂, 高永槟, 郑锦镇, 朱慈燕, 张庆武, 林黛英. 83例慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期D-二聚体与白蛋白比值、CT参数和肺功能相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 227-233.
[3] 殷琴, 晏宇涵, 姚伟, 徐成文, 戴小龙, 杨豪, 徐春伟, 王栋, 袁明, 刘振玉. 大黄辅助治疗多发伤继发急性肺损伤的研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 247-252.
[4] 姚平, 顾翔, 韩静, 杨苗苗, 沈鑫, 孙建, 戚小艳. 血清糖链抗原6和肺表面活性蛋白D预测221例结缔组织病相关间质性肺病及严重程度的研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 253-261.
[5] 肖攀云, 吴晓玲, 郝晓敏, 卫飞飞, 杨薇. 贝达喹啉合并肠内营养支持治疗对57例耐多药肺结核的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 106-111.
[6] 王辉, 汪海涛, 张建庆. 立体定向放射治疗后使用替雷利珠单抗治疗112例mNSCLC患者的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 124-131.
[7] 吴蓉, 蔡喆燚, 黄运华, 乐金海, 张萍, 陈献, 易琼. 跨肺驱动压导向呼气末正压通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺功能及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 866-871.
[8] 王春, 许斌, 刘丹, 陶承志, 林欢, 张海涛. 支气管肺泡灌洗液PTPN2水平与矽肺患者疾病严重程度和肺功能的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 904-910.
[9] 李晓颜, 邢爱花, 董瑞生, 王瑞玲, 贾子江, 郑丽琴. 血管细胞黏附分子-1、肝素结合蛋白蛋白及调节性T细胞水平检测对支气管哮喘并发肺部感染患者的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 911-916.
[10] 刘宝德, 郑娉娉, 肖宇翔, 沈凌, 王柳盛, 张维. 肺泡灌洗液中炎症因子对重症肺炎患者痰栓风险的预测分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 917-922.
[11] 杨苗苗, 顾翔, 杨柳, 孙天宇, 王梦林, 张拓, 王婷. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴肺气肿患者嗜酸性粒细胞计数与肺泡损伤的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 955-960.
[12] 付建力, 李鹏飞, 尹珊珊, 张艳彬, 胥杰, 刘涌. 吸入性皮质类固醇/长效抗胆碱能药物/长效β2受体激动剂联用治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病哮喘重叠综合征的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 961-965.
[13] 姜爽, 史东艳. 高流量氧疗与无创正压通气序贯治疗在老年COPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭救治中的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 10-15.
[14] 张立, 李巧妮, 贺帅, 王朝霞, 宁小康. 连续性血液净化联合血液灌流在严重脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的应用效果及PCT、hs-CRP、IL-6水平影响[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 26-31.
[15] 刘鑫, 王文惠, 吴守振. 脓毒症相关急性胃肠损伤患者I-FABP、D-乳酸及炎症因子变化及意义[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 351-355.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?