观察创伤急救绿道软件对提升医院创伤中心救治能力的效果。

回顾性分析北京门头沟区医院创伤中心2018年1月至2019年12月救治的128例重症创伤患者[损伤严重度评分(ISS)评分≥16]的临床资料，其中男性87例，女性48例，年龄20～65岁，平均年龄(54±7.62)岁。按照救治时间将患者分为对照组(60例)和研究组(68例)。对照组采用常规救治模式，研究组应用创伤急救绿道软件院前院内联动救治模式。比较两组专科会诊医师到达时间、患者完成全身快速电子计算机断层扫描(CT)检查时间、抢救室滞留时间。

研究组会诊医师到达时间[(5.07±3.31)min比(8.50±5.25)min]、全身快速CT检查完成时间[(27.88±10.30)min比(32.50±15.13)min]和抢救室滞留时间[(37.00±25.16)min比(48.00min±30.27)min]均短于对照组，差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。

创伤急救绿道软件应用于创伤救治中，可有效缩短创伤中心质控各时间节点，提升创伤中心救治能力。

To observe the effect of trauma greenway software on improving the treatment ability of hospital trauma center.

The clinical data of 128 patients with severe trauma (ISS score≥16) treated in Beijing Mentougou Hospital Trauma Center from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 87 males and 48 females with an average age of (54±7.62) years (range, 20-65 years). According to the treatment time, the patients were divided into control group (n=60) and study group (n=68). There was no significant difference in gender, age, condition and other general data between the two groups (P>0.05). The control group was treated with conventional treatment mode, and the study group was treated with trauma greenway software. The arrival time of specialist consultation doctors, the time of patients completing whole body rapid computed tomography (CT) and the residence time of rescue room were compared between the two groups.

The arrival time of the consultant [(5.07±3.31) min vs. (8.50±5.25) min], the completion time of whole body rapid CT examination [(27.88±10.30) min vs. (32.50±15.13) min] and the residence time in rescue room [(37.00±25.16) min vs. (48.00±30.27) min] in the study group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05).

The application of trauma greenway software in trauma treatment can effectively shorten the quality control time nodes of trauma center and improve the treatment ability of trauma center.