Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (06): 331-334. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9133.2022.06.003

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of the sedative effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on critically ill adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the prehospital setting

Xin Pan1, Hua Wang2,(), Xin Wang1, Hui Gu1, Chao Wang1   

  1. 1. Zhenjiang Emergency Center Emergency Department, Zhenjiang 212003, China; Department of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    2. Department of Pain, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China
  • Received:2022-11-05 Online:2022-12-18 Published:2023-02-16
  • Contact: Hua Wang

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the sedative effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in critically ill adults undergoing mechanical ventilation in the prehospital setting. The effects of two drugs on hemodynamic parameters were evaluated, and the correlation between bispectral index(BIS)and Ramsay sedation score(RSS)was observed.

Methods

Sixty hemodynamically stable patients requiring sedation and mechanical ventilation in the prehospital setting were prospectively randomized into two groups. Group A received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine(1 μg/kg)for more than 10 min, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1 (0.2~0.7 μg·kg-1·h-1). Group B was given a loading dose of propofol(1 mg/kg)for more than 5 min, followed by a maintenance infusion of 2 mg·kg-1·h-1(1~3 mg·kg-1·h-1). All patients were treated with fentanyl 1 μg/kg before the study drug. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored at the emergency scene and on admission, and their sedation level(using RSS and BIS) was monitored. Ramsay scores were compared with BIS mean values.

Results

The dexmedetomidine group had a significant decrease in heart rate during sedation, while the propofol group had a decrease in mean arterial pressure(MAP)during sedation. There was a good correlation between Ramsay score and BIS value.

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine can reduce heart rate and propofol can transiently affect mean arterial pressure. Both drugs are able to achieve adequate sedation, and there is a good correlation between Ramsay scores and BIS values. BIS surveillance is supported in assessing the applicability of sedation monitoring in prehospital emergency tracheal intubated patients with severe disease.

Key words: Dexmedetomidine, Propofol, Ramsay sedation score, BIS

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0519-81083787 E-mail: zhwsyj@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd