Abstract:
Objective To explore the differences in the goal setting levels between two regions, and to further study the results of the work implementation under the influence of the goal setting, finding the reasons caused differences, based on the preliminary research of the project team.
Methods The indexes of 2000-2017 related goals and work implementation in Jilin and Liaoning were collected in a systematic exhaustive way, and Spearman correlation and linear regression were used to analyze the impact of target setting in Jilin and Liaoning on the implementation of emergency work.
Results The goal setting level and work implementation of the emergency response areas in Liaoning and Liaoning were generally on the rise. In 2017, the target setting level of Jilin was 46%, the work implementation was 60%, and the Liaoning was 60% and 53.3%, and the target setting level was positively related to the implementation of the work.
Conclusion It is feasible to establish a scientific and quantitative emergency response target setting evaluation system with the public needs to be based and quantitatively testable target setting has positive feedback effects on the work implementation, promotion and improvement.
Key words:
goal setting,
emergency response,
work implementation
Ruohui Chen, Chaoyi Chen, Yan Zheng, Lin Pan, Ze Liu, Qunhong Wu, Yanhua Hao, Linmei Shi, Lingzhong Xu, Zhi Hu, Chengyue Li, Mo Hao. Correlation between the target setting of Jilin and Liaoning Province in the past 18 years and the implementation of emergency work of public health emergency[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2020, 06(01): 36-40.